IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 28 January 2015 16:57 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584711A1A68 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:57:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zpkr18jtoGFG for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:57:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B11731A00A3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:57:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1536; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1422464265; x=1423673865; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=7+Oplqzjm3SZ2IIa6rvbtYSyN3e+Z2iWz/qG0u+NAUI=; b=VcDWcXyj+5oAQTPdOp9h7oYyUH6iu9BH8sHztOAoRD4UMGH31X1RpTwI Tu/6Ug5YCEXAMIdob1lPdJUrmkShzq29MfzLvqODvlpHZYApIYrzTw86T 4TpNTZx3gIDo8/0XRIZwOf3ZuO4jsp20i9+UTpf/Lmr1MiT9SeMCgLI7I o=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 487
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjQFAFUUyVStJA2H/2dsb2JhbABagwaBL8pDgRxDAQEBAQF9hBN5EgGBACcEDhOIHtYkAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEbj3iDHYETBY5ugVOBKYYlgRWCf4JBi2cig26CM34BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,481,1418083200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="391496673"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Jan 2015 16:57:45 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com [173.37.183.78]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0SGvi6c030883 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:57:44 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.211]) by xhc-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([fe80::200:5efe:173.37.183.34%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:57:44 -0600
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call
Thread-Index: AQHQOxuJv5W9vu3skUKiVKZnDa9kKQ==
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:57:44 +0000
Message-ID: <8B808F0C-1AA8-4ABE-A06E-80652B9C1498@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.121]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E0D1BF64-7CFF-4473-A565-DC83A7D229C4"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/5WqAPt4rcYlawoq07IwmkWPnw04>
Cc: "draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:57:47 -0000

draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile has been through Quite a bit of change in the IESG. The ADs would like to see the working group read it again and comment - working group last call - before they proceed. To summarize, it provides requirements for handsets that would work in a specific business model. As such, it builds on RFC 6434 and 7066, strengthening some of those requirements, and going on to add requirements related to 464xlat and other technologies.

Please read it now, and comment. This WGLC will run until 15 February.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email