IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 23 February 2015 14:10 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24951A003B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:10:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WA3z5MMD1S7C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:10:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22e.google.com (mail-ig0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB9451A1A9E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:10:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f174.google.com with SMTP id b16so18336083igk.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:10:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=KXXp/0SITFqZfxOI221ZvYBKLZNuMgPhVQ6M2QDw+o8=; b=QQVmcqIHLLL7IW3p02MsB42gwMfWRbsv0NFQR3ofpDU6aeQ1u+IClmhUUSvnCxXydY xc9WcIZmySxvs/X5tdla/WFuXllou5JAnzwU3FCdXnHEboLEeNY9do2dlWEK70kY0KW/ 800ECuZ0BtFn+IiwkNUCzYdEBUktino8uVo//AH2emPYJLIrdhuf2ed5dfvumaaawghq wOi2SAHZP/CNlWx0TR6N7NpfkuzMbtUrEnBQ8AjU1IgbYBQw9iQim1LIateoKGmOWAf4 fVvGByzcj9Xj0ExI/71jJTUJ3z95SSNTj8GWVfTK3snA1iZrlBt8dPmHfVFUb3ZKVXtC Y6eg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=KXXp/0SITFqZfxOI221ZvYBKLZNuMgPhVQ6M2QDw+o8=; b=l7/t9YxMYFmgKptO6lda5f/KGhqB/yoh0WyW1kGXkjAvetRMSS6DzLLX8FB+oeu4Pr nhbT/ljXPadCCfuBoggaY1khJb3PsZ7ufB7BHCwxjgx6qDhCdPB5QMdJ2P7YzKbd+5Vr j7ph+oy7dbaOWWT5cfTJRu1RNDP8RjWmyy5nRj6RaV3UJ9w2P6UqqYNk9EctlXF93cIU yQcaqu5ufe8CDhxepG1CrNf07Xl4oH3wqRJ3cXdSZemjjeICotMHLhQflesbRu4wcF0E wFHPMh2Ulh4ECX4/jA/zctd1R8c49P+Y5gzi3ips2Qu+ge6zsblLy6+fnIuu1GKu7VJJ EWlA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlhj9KG3/FZte6NnnPvvMaT3wmI0TLRc7N6xUijCGuLVyJcafeQwdnBUeiyLzbLBOoxHACP
X-Received: by 10.107.161.200 with SMTP id k191mr13664062ioe.51.1424700628006; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:10:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.33.104 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2015 06:10:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D1109D5C.1AD8C%dave.michaud@rci.rogers.com>
References: <8B808F0C-1AA8-4ABE-A06E-80652B9C1498@cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1502201513320.4007@uplift.swm.pp.se> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004912254@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAKD1Yr3A6fzgTauLz+Yxe-xOLeDLZ5bzKBo-XyWU4i9LBSAM9Q@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330049122B6@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CAKD1Yr1c74gbnR51caf_WTKi7FFTbJP0KhwwXtabsvNhiE2Lgw@mail.gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330049124F0@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <D11092F8.1AD6E%dave.michaud@rci.rogers.com> <CAKD1Yr1ZG_rOZLCXtOjeNwAHbKzcnuRzUhitznp-5J0RP4CV9w@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1502231459150.4007@uplift.swm.pp.se> <D1109D5C.1AD8C%dave.michaud@rci.rogers.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 23:10:04 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3cjQat4PPJTziWHRibGuCSkqDVwDWL+M=XU+++amkxaw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Michaud <Dave.Michaud@rci.rogers.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140ed1ad82106050fc1f64f"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/bF1GC9meL7I8982K68LK_8xjeyk>
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 14:10:32 -0000

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:05 PM, Dave Michaud <Dave.Michaud@rci.rogers.com>
wrote:

> I am not saying that operators should or should not do that (it¹s up to
> them to decide) but if they send a CC52, I expect the UEs to request
> another primary PDP.
>
> If the operator does not want this behavior, CC50 and CC51 are available
> for that purpose.
>

But this group is in the business of providing operational guidance. It's
not in the business of rubberstamping operator requirements. And it's not
in the business of re-specifying behaviour that is already specified in
standards written by other standards bodies.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email