Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops

Lencse Gábor <lencse@hit.bme.hu> Mon, 14 September 2020 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0421B3A0838 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:09:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8-hojEvEcbZ8 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:09:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frogstar.hit.bme.hu (frogstar.hit.bme.hu [IPv6:2001:738:2001:4020::2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAF133A07F2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 07:09:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.113] (host-79-121-42-30.kabelnet.hu [79.121.42.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by frogstar.hit.bme.hu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 08EE8p8E015819 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:08:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lencse@hit.bme.hu)
X-Authentication-Warning: frogstar.hit.bme.hu: Host host-79-121-42-30.kabelnet.hu [79.121.42.30] claimed to be [192.168.1.113]
To: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <159985752195.15551.2657932726923781035@ietfa.amsl.com> <VI1P194MB0285E344B7B3E9697E6ED608AE240@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <3FA82C44-0005-45BA-AB09-FAE63C8CD626@gmail.com> <VI1P194MB028561F81F5118ABC14967DFAE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <3B5995B1-CD7A-444C-AD64-37C09E46A763@thehobsons.co.uk> <4fa01d01-bc2e-0f01-77f1-13dd4f6f2430@hit.bme.hu> <VI1P194MB0285FCDBFB6A86DF954D1782AE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Lencse_G=c3=a1bor?= <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
Message-ID: <dd073493-46f2-20f7-cce8-af2deacccb59@hit.bme.hu>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 16:08:47 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <VI1P194MB0285FCDBFB6A86DF954D1782AE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at frogstar.hit.bme.hu
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Received-SPF: pass (frogstar.hit.bme.hu: authenticated connection) receiver=frogstar.hit.bme.hu; client-ip=79.121.42.30; helo=[192.168.1.113]; envelope-from=lencse@hit.bme.hu; x-software=spfmilter 2.001 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2-1.2.10;
X-DCC--Metrics: frogstar.hit.bme.hu; whitelist
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 152.66.248.44
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/NI3fJU0FhYcgE0ysfaw8QqGLsb4>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 14:09:06 -0000

I did not copy the opinion of others. I was a member of that list, and 
it was my conviction, too. And I also witnessed, how some people tried 
to kindly explain you why your proposal was not working. As they did not 
succeed, I do not even try.

Gábor

14/09/2020 15:55 keltezéssel, Khaled Omar írta:
> Hi,
>
> Don't copy the opinion that was mentioned there, use your own mind and give a clear opinion to make the discussion beneficial.
>
> Maybe they have their own reasoning.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Khaled Omar
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Lencse Gábor
> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 3:52 PM
> To: v6ops@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops
>
> Simon, you are completely right: this thing has already been discussed on int-area mailing list in 2017. It was pointed out that the name was misleading, as well as that this solution was not at all viable as an
> IPv6 transition mechanism.
>
> I do not see any reason to reiterate the topic on this mailing list.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Gábor
>
> 14/09/2020 15:09 keltezéssel, Simon Hobson írta:
>> Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> Is it possible to reserve a slot for the IPv10 I-D to be presented completely during the v6ops wg meeting session?
>>>>
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omar-ipv10-06
>> I only had a quick look, but doesn't this just re-hash discussions/documentation that's already been done elsewhere ?
>> Also, I think calling it IPv10 is just asking to cause confusion - it
>> should be rejected just for that ;-)
>>
>> Simon
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> v6ops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>