Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109

[Khaled Omar <[e-mail]>]

Hi Fernando,

>> it was mean to be a successor of IPv6.

No problem, you still can read and WATCH how IPv10 works first then make up your own comments.

Best Regards,

Khaled Omar

-----Original Message-----
From: Fernando Gont <[e-mail]> 
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2020 7:33 AM
To: Khaled Omar <[e-mail]>; Ron Bonica <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109

Hi, Khaled,

Sorry, I haven't read your draft and thought (as a consecuence of its
name) that it was mean to be a successor of IPv6 -- hence my coments.

Regards,
Fernando




On 12/9/20 01:41, Khaled Omar wrote:
> Hi fernando,
> 
> IPv10 is not an address structure, it is a "solution" that allows ipv4 
> and ipv6 to coexist and communicate to each others peacefully without 
> any problems.
> 
> I was fighting to make it be used before the problem goes bigger and 
> all of us will pay the delay cost, i'm trying to help as much as i can 
> to make it easier for the benefits of all and move first to the 
> solution before the problem occurs clearly.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Khaled Omar
> 
> Get Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
> *From:* Fernando Gont <[e-mail]>
> *Sent:* Saturday, September 12, 2020 6:33:39 AM
> *To:* Khaled Omar <[e-mail]>; Ron Bonica 
> <[e-mail]>
> *Cc:* [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail] 
> <[e-mail]>
> *Subject:* Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 
> 109 Hi, Khaled,
> 
> As a wg participant, may I ask how IP*v10* would be within the 
> charter/sphere of *v6*ops?
> 
> Thanks,
> Fernando
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 11/9/20 20:42, Khaled Omar wrote:
>> Hi Ron,
>> 
>> Hope my I-D is clear for you, let me ask if we can reserve a slot for the IP-v10 I-D to be discussed during the next coming meeting so we can solve the problem that IMHO became clear for everyone even students.
>> 
>> Good Luck,
>> 
>> Khaled Omar
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Khaled Omar
>> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 10:56 PM
>> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>> Subject: RE: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109
>> 
>> Hi V6OPS WG,
>> 
>> Is it possible to reserve a slot for the IPv10 I-D to be presented completely during the v6ops wg meeting session?
>> 
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omar-ipv10-06
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> 
>> Khaled Omar
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: v6ops <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of IETF Meeting 
>> Session Request Tool
>> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 10:52 PM
>> To: [e-mail]
>> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>> Subject: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Fred Baker, a Chair of the v6ops working group.
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> Working Group Name: IPv6 Operations
>> Area Name: Operations and Management Area Session Requester: Fred 
>> Baker
>> 
>> 
>> Number of Sessions: 1
>> Length of Session(s):  2 Hours
>> Number of Attendees: 100
>> Conflicts to Avoid:
>>   Chair Conflict: spring lsr 6man intarea idr
>> 
>>   Key Participant Conflict: rtgwg tsvarea panrg grow tsvwg
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> People who must be present:
>>    Fred Baker
>>    Ron Bonica
>>    Warren &quot;Ace&quot; Kumari
>> 
>> Resources Requested:
>> 
>> Special Requests:
>>    
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>> 
> 
> 
> --
> Fernando Gont
> SI6 Networks
> e-mail: [e-mail]
> PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
> 
> 
> 
> 


--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: [e-mail]
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492