Re: [v6tc] Let the market decide or not: L2TP and/or TSP

Jerome Durand <jdurand@renater.fr> Mon, 11 April 2005 10:26 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA29435; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 06:26:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DKwHN-0003HQ-7R; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 06:36:29 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DKw1Z-0006Yu-KC; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 06:20:09 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DKw1Y-0006XE-6m for v6tc@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 06:20:08 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA28973 for <v6tc@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 06:19:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail1.renater.fr ([193.49.159.8]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DKwAl-00039J-AQ for v6tc@ietf.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 06:29:40 -0400
Received: from [193.49.159.162] (helo=[193.49.159.162]) by mail1.renater.fr with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DKw11-0004qG-J1; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:19:36 +0200
Message-ID: <425A4F43.50801@renater.fr>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:19:47 +0200
From: Jerome Durand <jdurand@renater.fr>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Subject: Re: [v6tc] Let the market decide or not: L2TP and/or TSP
References: <200504081806.j38I6Z1M013207@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr> <1112984642.1788.15.camel@firenze.zurich.ibm.com> <2ebbfb91d40e6f9790ef7c1db0abc78e@tycool.net> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504090254480.17023@netcore.fi>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504090254480.17023@netcore.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "mail1.renater.fr", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see postmaster@renater.fr for details. Content preview: > Or if the ISP is worried about Windows clients, > it can always run Teredo in tunnel server mode (provided that a > reasonable server implementation exists), as that client is already > supported and deployed. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 30ac594df0e66ffa5a93eb4c48bcb014
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: v6tc@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: v6tc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6tc.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/v6tc>
List-Post: <mailto:v6tc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Or if the ISP is worried about Windows clients, 
> it can always run Teredo in tunnel server mode (provided that a 
> reasonable server implementation exists), as that client is already 
> supported and deployed.

Short comment: and ISP needs manageable solutions, and TEREDO doesn't 
look like this. (same for 6to4 BTW).

Jerome

_______________________________________________
v6tc mailing list
v6tc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc