IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts

"Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com> Thu, 07 April 2005 16:34 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA12164; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:34:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DJa6O-0001aP-IH; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:43:32 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DJZns-0007zY-AC; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:24:24 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DJZnq-0007z4-Pj for v6tc@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:24:23 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA10803 for <v6tc@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:24:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailout.zma.compaq.com ([161.114.64.103] helo=zmamail03.zma.compaq.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DJZwN-00012Z-Vm for v6tc@ietf.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:33:15 -0400
Received: from tayexg11.americas.cpqcorp.net (tayexg11.americas.cpqcorp.net [16.103.130.186]) by zmamail03.zma.compaq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D56188; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:24:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net ([16.103.130.26]) by tayexg11.americas.cpqcorp.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 7 Apr 2005 12:24:07 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 12:24:06 -0400
Message-ID: <9C422444DE99BC46B3AD3C6EAFC9711B08C656AD@tayexc13.americas.cpqcorp.net>
Thread-Topic: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts
Thread-Index: AcU6fux+IUjxYLlATS2qtLY+xkOAagAthQcw
From: "Bound, Jim" <jim.bound@hp.com>
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>, Jerome Durand <jdurand@renater.fr>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2005 16:24:07.0296 (UTC) FILETIME=[38B8D800:01C53B8E]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cab78e1e39c4b328567edb48482b6a69
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org, v6tc@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: v6tc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6tc.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/v6tc>
List-Post: <mailto:v6tc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0ddefe323dd869ab027dbfff7eff0465
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I agree strongly with Pekka.  I still see no strong argument for a vtc
working group.
/jim 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6tc-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of Pekka Savola
> Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 4:02 AM
> To: Jerome Durand
> Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org; v6tc@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts
> 
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Jerome Durand wrote:
> >>> Opinions?
> >
> > I am not sure I share the view that the BOF was a 
> non-event. There was an 
> > agreement from a *large majority* of people in the room to 
> say that the WG 
> > should take TSP that fulfills all requirements presented, 
> and make it a 
> > standard. Now I guess it's time to move on in that direction.
> 
> It will be interesting to see BoF minutes, because I didn't see large 
> majority.  For what it's worth, my recollection was:
> 
> I saw less than about 5-10 people supporting TSP.
> I saw less than about 5-10 people supporting doing something new.
> I saw less than about 5-10 people being comfortable with existing
>    mechanisms (like L2TP).
> 
> Bottom line is that if we don't need to care about the RTT and 
> overhead concerns at all, I can't clearly see real benefits for TSP 
> instead of just using L2TP.
> 
> -- 
> Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
> Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
> Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6tc mailing list
> v6tc@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc
> 

_______________________________________________
v6tc mailing list
v6tc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email