Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts

Fred,

The point is that all that work was already in v6ops and fits in the
charter, so unless v6tc or something else take over with a specific WG, I
will say, there should be no problem to continue in v6ops.

My intend is to continue this work, even if it needs to be done as personal
document, but of course, will be better and much more happy if it becomes a
WG document, and consequently will have more inputs and a higher level of
consensus.

Regards,
Jordi

> De: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
> Responder a: <fred@cisco.com>
> Fecha: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 13:02:28 -0700
> Para: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
> CC: <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, "v6tc@ietf.org" <v6tc@ietf.org>
> Asunto: Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts
> 
> On Apr 7, 2005, at 12:23 PM, Thomas Narten wrote:
>> I assumed v6ops doesn't care to see the follow-up discussion (which
>> will probably not be short) that will be needed to add additional
>> clarity to this question.
> 
> I have authors that are very interested in figuring out where to do
> their work. I have sent notes to the AD and gotten no response. I'm
> looking for guidance.
> 
> I just hope that I get a clear answer from someone somewhere that I can
> use to definitively decide what gets accepted in my working group, what
> gets accepted somewhere else, and what doesn't get accepted.

************************************
Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit
Registration open. Information available at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.

_______________________________________________
v6tc mailing list
v6tc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc