IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts

Jerome Durand <jdurand@renater.fr> Wed, 06 April 2005 07:56 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA11444; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 03:56:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DJ5Ww-0003E8-Mt; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 04:04:55 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DJ5OI-0006YZ-0X; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 03:55:58 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DJ5OG-0006YP-Go for v6tc@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 03:55:56 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA11401 for <v6tc@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 03:55:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail1.renater.fr ([193.49.159.8]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DJ5WY-0003Cx-5S for v6tc@ietf.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 04:04:31 -0400
Received: from [193.49.159.162] (helo=[193.49.159.162]) by mail1.renater.fr with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DJ5Nm-0007qR-DG; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:55:27 +0200
Message-ID: <425395F8.50501@renater.fr>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:55:36 +0200
From: Jerome Durand <jdurand@renater.fr>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Subject: Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts
References: <BE78FA5D.F1CA3%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
In-Reply-To: <BE78FA5D.F1CA3%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "mail1.renater.fr", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see postmaster@renater.fr for details. Content preview: >>Opinions? I am not sure I share the view that the BOF was a non-event. There was an agreement from a *large majority* of people in the room to say that the WG should take TSP that fulfills all requirements presented, and make it a standard. Now I guess it's time to move on in that direction. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++)
X-Scan-Signature: 7bac9cb154eb5790ae3b2913587a40de
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "v6ops@ops.ietf.org" <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, "v6tc@ietf.org" <v6tc@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: v6tc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6tc.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/v6tc>
List-Post: <mailto:v6tc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

>>Opinions?

I am not sure I share the view that the BOF was a non-event. There was 
an agreement from a *large majority* of people in the room to say that 
the WG should take TSP that fulfills all requirements presented, and 
make it a standard. Now I guess it's time to move on in that direction.

Jerome



_______________________________________________
v6tc mailing list
v6tc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email