Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts

I don't think the L2TP client is a problem, even if they aren't available
now, is equivalent to the availability of a new protocol.

My point regarding the lack of support of L2TP in more and more hotels and
hot spots, and that's why I think the encapsulation should be flexible.

I've also no idea about how much the 3G folks will like to implement L2TP.

Regards,
Jordi

> De: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
> Organización: Unfix
> Responder a: <v6tc-bounces@ietf.org>
> Fecha: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 13:15:32 +0200
> Para: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
> CC: "v6tc@ietf.org" <v6tc@ietf.org>, Jerome Durand <jdurand@renater.fr>
> Asunto: Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts
> 
> On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 13:12 +0300, Pekka Savola wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Jerome Durand wrote:
>>> The point here is that as an ISP, I'd prefer to work with a standard,
>>> manageable and available solution. Is one already available? If yes that is
>>> worth documenting how to use/deploy it (in v6ops WG). If not, then we have
>>> to 
>>> adopt a new standard (in v6tc as v6ops is not made for it).
>> 
>> L2TP ?
> 
> Client for all OS's that support it doing IPv6 ?
> 
> Greets,
>  Jeroen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6tc mailing list
> v6tc@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc

************************************
Barcelona 2005 Global IPv6 Summit
Registration open. Information available at:
http://www.ipv6-es.com

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.

_______________________________________________
v6tc mailing list
v6tc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc