IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts

Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> Wed, 06 April 2005 08:03 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA12323; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 04:03:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DJ5di-0003VE-V8; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 04:11:56 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DJ5U8-00010k-Rq; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 04:02:00 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DJ5U5-0000xx-Tb for v6tc@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 04:01:59 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA12127 for <v6tc@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 04:01:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from netcore.fi ([193.94.160.1]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DJ5cO-0003SK-1o for v6tc@ietf.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 04:10:33 -0400
Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j3681bD11961; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 11:01:37 +0300
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:01:37 +0300
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: Jerome Durand <jdurand@renater.fr>
Subject: Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts
In-Reply-To: <425395F8.50501@renater.fr>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0504061057570.11494@netcore.fi>
References: <BE78FA5D.F1CA3%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <425395F8.50501@renater.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Cc: "v6ops@ops.ietf.org" <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, "v6tc@ietf.org" <v6tc@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: v6tc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6tc.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/v6tc>
List-Post: <mailto:v6tc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d

On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Jerome Durand wrote:
>>> Opinions?
>
> I am not sure I share the view that the BOF was a non-event. There was an 
> agreement from a *large majority* of people in the room to say that the WG 
> should take TSP that fulfills all requirements presented, and make it a 
> standard. Now I guess it's time to move on in that direction.

It will be interesting to see BoF minutes, because I didn't see large 
majority.  For what it's worth, my recollection was:

I saw less than about 5-10 people supporting TSP.
I saw less than about 5-10 people supporting doing something new.
I saw less than about 5-10 people being comfortable with existing
   mechanisms (like L2TP).

Bottom line is that if we don't need to care about the RTT and 
overhead concerns at all, I can't clearly see real benefits for TSP 
instead of just using L2TP.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

_______________________________________________
v6tc mailing list
v6tc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email