IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Wed, 06 April 2005 07:39 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA10388; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 03:39:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DJ5Gm-0002W5-Mg; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 03:48:13 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DJ57v-0003cL-PI; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 03:39:03 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DIyjK-0004xA-SS for v6tc@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 20:49:15 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA06366 for <v6tc@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:49:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DIyrZ-00063J-He for v6tc@ietf.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2005 20:57:46 -0400
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com (171.68.223.137) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Apr 2005 17:49:04 -0700
Received: from [10.32.244.218] (stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com [10.32.244.218]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with SMTP id j360n1gT017273; Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BE78FA5D.F1CA3%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
References: <BE78FA5D.F1CA3%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <144826f4710aa69d457773a8c3862a53@cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 17:49:00 -0700
To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2)
X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 03:39:02 -0400
Cc: "v6ops@ops.ietf.org" <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, "v6tc@ietf.org" <v6tc@ietf.org>
Subject: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts
X-BeenThere: v6tc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6tc.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/v6tc>
List-Post: <mailto:v6tc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Apr 5, 2005, at 5:30 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:

> Despite that, I would not exclude that some of the mechanisms want to 
> follow
> their actual process and go for informational

I obviously have no problem with informational notes. Teredo is going 
that route, Silkroad is going through the Chinese Standards Agency, 
DSTM appears to be opting for "just do it", and so on.

I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, the IETF is going to do.

_______________________________________________
v6tc mailing list
v6tc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email