Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts

"Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki)" <jonne.soininen@nokia.com> Wed, 06 April 2005 09:33 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA19333; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 05:33:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DJ73F-0006bB-Dv; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:42:22 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DJ6ty-0005Xi-Fe; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:32:46 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DJ6tw-0005Xa-Jp for v6tc@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:32:44 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA19256 for <v6tc@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 05:32:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mgw-x1.nokia.com ([131.228.20.21]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DJ72F-0006aE-L9 for v6tc@ietf.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:41:21 -0400
Received: from esdks002.ntc.nokia.com (esdks002.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.121]) by mgw-x1.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id j369WTG01850; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:32:30 +0300 (EET DST)
X-Scanned: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:31:47 +0300 Nokia Message Protector V1.3.34 2004121512 - RELEASE
Received: (from root@localhost) by esdks002.ntc.nokia.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id j369Vl6A005729; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:31:47 +0300
Received: from mgw-int1.ntc.nokia.com (172.21.143.96) by esdks002.ntc.nokia.com 00ccSVQj; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:29:47 EEST
Received: from esebh003.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh003.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.82]) by mgw-int1.ntc.nokia.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id j369ThM11673; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:29:43 +0300 (EET DST)
Received: from esebh101.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.177]) by esebh003.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6881); Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:29:37 +0300
Received: from esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.118]) by esebh101.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 6 Apr 2005 12:29:37 +0300
Received: from 172.21.154.156 ([172.21.154.156]) by esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.118]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:29:37 +0000
Received: from essrv103nok154156.ntc.nokia.com by ESEBE100.noe.nokia.com; 06 Apr 2005 12:29:37 +0300
Subject: Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts
From: "Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki)" <jonne.soininen@nokia.com>
To: ext Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <144826f4710aa69d457773a8c3862a53@cisco.com>
References: <BE78FA5D.F1CA3%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <144826f4710aa69d457773a8c3862a53@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <1112779776.5681.149.camel@essrv103nok154156.ntc.nokia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2005 12:29:37 +0300
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Apr 2005 09:29:37.0814 (UTC) FILETIME=[26F14B60:01C53A8B]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "v6ops@ops.ietf.org" <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, "v6tc@ietf.org" <v6tc@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: v6tc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6tc.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/v6tc>
List-Post: <mailto:v6tc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 3.0 (+++)
X-Scan-Signature: a7d6aff76b15f3f56fcb94490e1052e4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Fred,


On Wed, 2005-04-06 at 03:49, ext Fred Baker wrote:
> On Apr 5, 2005, at 5:30 PM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> 
> > Despite that, I would not exclude that some of the mechanisms want to 
> > follow
> > their actual process and go for informational
> 
> I obviously have no problem with informational notes. Teredo is going 
> that route, Silkroad is going through the Chinese Standards Agency, 
> DSTM appears to be opting for "just do it", and so on.

Just a simple correction: Teredo is going to Proposed as individual
submission. ISATAP on the other hand is going to Informational. 

> 
> I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, the IETF is going to do.

Tell me as well, if you find out... ;)

Cheers,

Jonne.

> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6tc mailing list
> v6tc@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc
-- 
Jonne Soininen
Nokia

Tel: +358 40 527 46 34
E-mail: jonne.soininen@nokia.com

_______________________________________________
v6tc mailing list
v6tc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc