IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6tc] Let the market decide or not: L2TP and/or TSP

Alain Durand <alain@tycool.net> Fri, 08 April 2005 21:19 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA13318; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:19:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DK128-0007Ez-EP; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:28:57 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DK0sQ-0004hs-Fo; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:18:54 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DK0sL-0004hV-7U for v6tc@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:18:49 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA13230 for <v6tc@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:18:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dsl093-039-075.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.39.75] helo=smtp-e.tycool.net) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DK119-0007De-Sy for v6tc@ietf.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 17:27:57 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (unknown [192.168.1.2]) by smtp-e.tycool.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7160EF; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4256E3F8.4040705@cisco.com>
References: <BE7CA492.F2D04%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <4256E3F8.4040705@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <7c52f421fc8234fc94e6f09f0f0a9b16@tycool.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alain Durand <alain@tycool.net>
Subject: Re: [v6tc] Let the market decide or not: L2TP and/or TSP
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:18:41 -0700
To: "W. Mark Townsley" <townsley@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "v6tc@ietf.org" <v6tc@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: v6tc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6tc.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/v6tc>
List-Post: <mailto:v6tc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Apr 8, 2005, at 1:05 PM, W. Mark Townsley wrote:
> JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>
>>> 1) is a combined mechanism for fixed/wireless 3G network still
>>> important?
>> Somehow I could say yes, because we don't want to have in the small 
>> devices
>> (such as cellular phones, both protocols, for example when they have 
>> both 3G
>> and WLAN interfaces).
>> But an alternative is a self adaptative protocol which is actually 
>> like both
>> well integrated.
>
> I think the clients would only really need to implement one type of 
> protocol, though the servers would need to implement all.

What about dual mode handsets (3G & 802.11)?

	- Alain.


_______________________________________________
v6tc mailing list
v6tc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email