IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: l2tp support on OS's Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts

Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr> Sat, 09 April 2005 13:26 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA06731; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 09:26:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DKG7Z-0000C4-Eu; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:35:33 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DKFyG-0002MD-Hw; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:25:56 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DKFyE-0002M5-Mq for v6tc@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:25:54 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA06709 for <v6tc@ietf.org>; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 09:25:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from laposte.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr ([192.44.77.17]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DKG7B-0000BS-W7 for v6tc@ietf.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2005 09:35:11 -0400
Received: from givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr [193.52.74.194]) by laposte.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (8.11.6p2/8.11.6/2003.04.01) with ESMTP id j39DPZg31496; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 15:25:35 +0200
Received: from givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (localhost.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr [127.0.0.1]) by givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j39DPZVb018476; Sat, 9 Apr 2005 15:25:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dupont@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr)
Message-Id: <200504091325.j39DPZVb018476@givry.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr>
From: Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
To: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Subject: Re: l2tp support on OS's Re: [v6tc] Re: Tunneling and Transition Drafts
In-reply-to: Your message of Sat, 09 Apr 2005 11:39:02 +0200. <BE7D6F56.F2D85%jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 15:25:35 +0200
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) at enst-bretagne.fr
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Cc: "v6tc@ietf.org" <v6tc@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: v6tc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6tc.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/v6tc>
List-Post: <mailto:v6tc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc>, <mailto:v6tc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: v6tc-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d

 In your previous mail you wrote:

   I guess you forget:
   1) Cellular phones, I don't think none of them support or even has plans for
   L2TP.

=> I disagree: L2TP will be heavily used in this context, not for its ability
to run over nearly anything, but for its primary function: extend PPP / move
PPP endpoints.

   2) Lots of low cost CPEs.
   
=> I can see exactly the opposite, for instance L2TP is supported by
the last code on Linksys WRT54G/GS which is the cannonical example of
low cost CPEs.

   Both of this options represent also a big market share.
   
=> L2TP is like PPPoE, a natural and common variation over PPP.
I'd like IPv6 will be the same for IPv4...

Regards

Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr

_______________________________________________
v6tc mailing list
v6tc@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6tc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email