IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [85attendees] Initial Atlanta experiences

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Mon, 05 November 2012 13:10 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B9521F8681 for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 05:10:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.963
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.963 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.364, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4DLD2xR4WF1k for <85attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 05:10:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-4.cisco.com (ams-iport-4.cisco.com [144.254.224.147]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9B021F85EE for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 05:10:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=315; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1352121006; x=1353330606; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9LQfcT5A/KENGzJnHJhfAhYWI89msd1E4m8ONxI9cBU=; b=ADYwqhiD+74XCVMOkwz7bs1F9aXTEs4x9s4EQDpaGss/hNMRyoe/rRZB xZt2vVXeTXsmE5hwAW7yODwI2/ka80dU0tSEoGh7qY4ykhXpyb87s6o6k 6tMhOPfwdwFTNIcW/mE2Mj3P4csdE4e6S8znPG43zsexcAwJMiPbiJsKp 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAGa5l1CQ/khM/2dsb2JhbABEv3KDToEIgh4BAQEEEgECI0ARCxgJFg8JAwIBAgFFEwgBAR6HaJpFg08Qm3qMAYMXgyUDlXuOWYEGZR2CUg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,714,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="9350395"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by ams-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Nov 2012 13:10:04 +0000
Received: from cisco.com (mrwint.cisco.com [64.103.70.36]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qA5DA4BL030000 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <85attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 13:10:04 GMT
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cisco.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id qA5DA2qk011496; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 13:10:03 GMT
Message-ID: <5097BAA9.7080907@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:10:01 +0000
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 85attendees@ietf.org
References: <50942F11.4060508@piuha.net> <5094342C.7090206@piuha.net> <99B887114EDB1449941CFBC8EC279FA13263F2E0@PRVPEXVS17.corp.twcable.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A64045B6690@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04083B1E89@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <62E727BC-E4F5-4345-9E20-5FED01355D7B@townsley.net> <D4D47BCFFE5A004F95D707546AC0D7E9185D1479@SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <124E5C54-1B5C-4F28-B62F-8A977B1FAD2F@hughes.com> <4DEE62EB-4379-4DA1-9438-E2ED0F81209C@fugue.com> <5096CBF5.20001@nomountain.net> <CALuKpQ3x=KYmaTVQ7yande8F4AjNMmJeUuG-reQ6wprZZsNJ+g@mail.gmail.com> <CALzoG+_eBgFh-tu3NV3O9gabU7ANC4XVEiNmoHtgKC_eLyUmcQ@mail.gmail.com> <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC9045E5B95@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il>
In-Reply-To: <07F7D7DED63154409F13298786A2ADC9045E5B95@EXRAD5.ad.rad.co.il>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [85attendees] Initial Atlanta experiences
X-BeenThere: 85attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: IETF 85 attendees mailing list <85attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/85attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:85attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/85attendees>, <mailto:85attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:10:07 -0000

On 05/11/2012 12:20, Yaakov Stein wrote:
> (I checked, there is no way to avoid the 2nd security check).
Since you have to be re-united with your checked luggage as
part of the customs process, surely there would be a security
domain violation if you did not need to go through 2nd
security check?

Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email