Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 14 November 2014 19:21 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0C51A8ABF for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:21:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.495
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.495 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CIR5LJ0A6iwQ for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:21:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 619301A8746 for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:21:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4501D200A1; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:23:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id AA573637F4; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:21:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921D7637EA; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:21:44 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <1286918D-58E1-420A-94CE-62B3F9D3287A@muada.com>
References: <CB79E3A1-A560-41A3-90CF-E1302AC6997E@bangj.com> <3305B86C-1752-4D30-9A0D-70EFD23506E6@muada.com> <1286918D-58E1-420A-94CE-62B3F9D3287A@muada.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:21:44 -0500
Message-ID: <32424.1415992904@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/91attendees/2VRjSJOqTlvnjwhJ1LvNtqSpe4w
Cc: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>, "<91attendees@ietf.org>" <91attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives
X-BeenThere: 91attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 91 attendees that have opted in on this list." <91attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/91attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:91attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:21:46 -0000
Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> wrote: > Oh, and I meant to include: > Don't underestimate the value of having everyone in the same room at > the same time for beverages and snacks. If everyone needs to run out to > buy their own this will use up time that can't be used for impromptu > discussions. +100. It's the reason I don't just always attend remotely. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Tom Pusateri
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Jon Hudson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Toerless Eckert
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Bob Hinden
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Daniel Jewell
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Tom Pusateri
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Livingood, Jason
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Ray Pelletier
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Jared Mauch
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Michael Richardson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Michael Richardson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Dominik Bay
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Jon Hudson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Jon Hudson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Eggert, Lars
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives ietf
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Toerless Eckert (eckert)
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Voyer, Daniel (520309)
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Ray Pelletier
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Livingood, Jason
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Alan Whinery
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Ray Pelletier
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives David Conrad
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Alan Whinery