IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Fri, 14 November 2014 21:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA291ACCD9 for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:04:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WqU6c7_DIQgE for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:04:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E9171ACC89 for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:04:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (dhcp-bfe9.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.191.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E8108A031 for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 21:03:59 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 16:03:59 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: 91attendees@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20141114210358.GJ3008@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <CB79E3A1-A560-41A3-90CF-E1302AC6997E@bangj.com> <F4CB1B4F-5681-47B8-B522-2C1CFE8989F6@gmail.com> <F96AFD65-DE2A-4A5A-B058-D0B96D96260F@puck.nether.net> <546658E3.2040500@rrbone.net> <1EBC33C7-E093-4166-AA06-95B030AC99C7@cisco.com> <8DE7E39C-5D9E-4D08-BD91-2188D23A0E8D@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8DE7E39C-5D9E-4D08-BD91-2188D23A0E8D@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/91attendees/ZFeXY1UKsTlHfiCdemWqNsQwI9Q
Subject: Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives
X-BeenThere: 91attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 91 attendees that have opted in on this list." <91attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/91attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:91attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 21:04:02 -0000

On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:00:14AM -1000, Jon Hudson wrote:
> 
> Would just be nice if those of us with "corporate sponsors" could help those who are "free agents"

I don't know about your corporate sponsor, but mine is not ok with me
choosing to pay a higher price if I can get a lower one.

It might be possible to set up a fund for donations to such
participants, however.  (No, I am not volunteering.)  Corporations
could then donate to that fund.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email