IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Fri, 14 November 2014 20:14 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A4E1A9121 for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:14:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GFM2YUorzvdo for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:14:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4FFE1A910F for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:14:06 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1375; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415996047; x=1417205647; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=aXGeGyfBDZt/lNdqDYqsmVBRLwslfNy0uq47n47BDZM=; b=XWAoxj4C5UgfQCcpAuZkeD3cX6l5KIqw/GG0H0rzZtNepJgjbyzUWkFV fLHpg/H2/SLsvFGFCz1GC/eSlmXifcKqXOi36wqLZAI/t31zKlBfb88so HymmdAR6w9SojIhBiibHy1crgelqFlidfwHXViffQb7O9QxoprtA/RHC+ k=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag4FAGZhZlStJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABbgw6BLgTUTwKBHRYBAQEBAX2EAwEBAwF5BQsCAQgOODIlAgQOBQ6IKgnSIwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReRIgeDLYEeAQSSR4IcgVSIFZZ6g3xtgUiBAwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,387,1413244800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="96743887"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Nov 2014 20:14:06 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sAEKE6UC019314 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:14:06 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.248]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:14:06 -0600
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Dominik Bay <db@rrbone.net>
Thread-Topic: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives
Thread-Index: AQHQADp+ar48aczudUyLwH3R0WYo3Zxg566AgAALggA=
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:14:05 +0000
Message-ID: <1EBC33C7-E093-4166-AA06-95B030AC99C7@cisco.com>
References: <CB79E3A1-A560-41A3-90CF-E1302AC6997E@bangj.com> <F4CB1B4F-5681-47B8-B522-2C1CFE8989F6@gmail.com> <F96AFD65-DE2A-4A5A-B058-D0B96D96260F@puck.nether.net> <546658E3.2040500@rrbone.net>
In-Reply-To: <546658E3.2040500@rrbone.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.21.147.71]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0D330F5F-4D6E-4B11-91B1-D3C8E4F3DC81"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/91attendees/M6BTXsEL8l1GdLNjaGYltKeG0YY
Cc: "91attendees@ietf.org" <91attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives
X-BeenThere: 91attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 91 attendees that have opted in on this list." <91attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/91attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:91attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:14:08 -0000

On Nov 14, 2014, at 9:32 AM, Dominik Bay <db@rrbone.net> wrote:

> I think IETF is missing the (large) budget coming from membership fees
> and mostly relies on sponsors and meeting fees for the whole meeting.

Pretty much. We also have a somewhat invisible sponsor in ISOC, which uses money from organizational members supplemented by some PIR funding to fill the gaps; that is the closest thing we have to the membership fees another organization might have. We should note, btw, that the money is not really about “what does it cost to meet in a hotel” as much as “how do we run a certain set of services 24X7X365 and in addition meet several times a year."

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email