Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives
"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 14 November 2014 21:07 UTC
Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7843D1ACCF4 for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:07:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1cwUubwhMK-E for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:06:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 688B01ACCF8 for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:06:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 7F0A464D9FDEB; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 21:06:48 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id sAEL6pLC029022 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 14 Nov 2014 22:06:52 +0100
Received: from FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.7.25]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 22:06:51 +0100
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>, "91attendees@ietf.org" <91attendees@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives
Thread-Index: AQHQADp+ar48aczudUyLwH3R0WYo3Zxg566AgAALggD//5eQAIAAAQyAgAARHEA=
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 21:06:51 +0000
Message-ID: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B27B7BD@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <CB79E3A1-A560-41A3-90CF-E1302AC6997E@bangj.com> <F4CB1B4F-5681-47B8-B522-2C1CFE8989F6@gmail.com> <F96AFD65-DE2A-4A5A-B058-D0B96D96260F@puck.nether.net> <546658E3.2040500@rrbone.net> <1EBC33C7-E093-4166-AA06-95B030AC99C7@cisco.com> <8DE7E39C-5D9E-4D08-BD91-2188D23A0E8D@gmail.com> <20141114210358.GJ3008@mx1.yitter.info>
In-Reply-To: <20141114210358.GJ3008@mx1.yitter.info>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.41]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/91attendees/yR8lnJRWeSxpkriF0C_XXibz4jY
Subject: Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives
X-BeenThere: 91attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 91 attendees that have opted in on this list." <91attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/91attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:91attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 21:07:01 -0000
The route for donations already exist through becoming an ISOC sponsor. https://www.internetsociety.org/form/donation Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: 91attendees [mailto:91attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan > Sent: 14 November 2014 21:04 > To: 91attendees@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:00:14AM -1000, Jon Hudson wrote: > > > > Would just be nice if those of us with "corporate sponsors" > could help those who are "free agents" > > I don't know about your corporate sponsor, but mine is not ok > with me choosing to pay a higher price if I can get a lower one. > > It might be possible to set up a fund for donations to such > participants, however. (No, I am not volunteering.) > Corporations could then donate to that fund. > > A > > -- > Andrew Sullivan > ajs@anvilwalrusden.com > > _______________________________________________ > 91attendees mailing list > 91attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees >
- [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Tom Pusateri
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Jon Hudson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Toerless Eckert
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Bob Hinden
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Daniel Jewell
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Tom Pusateri
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Livingood, Jason
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Ray Pelletier
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Jared Mauch
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Michael Richardson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Michael Richardson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Dominik Bay
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Jon Hudson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Jon Hudson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Eggert, Lars
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives ietf
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Toerless Eckert (eckert)
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Voyer, Daniel (520309)
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Ray Pelletier
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Livingood, Jason
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Alan Whinery
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Ray Pelletier
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives David Conrad
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Alan Whinery