IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives

Jon Hudson <jon.hudson@gmail.com> Fri, 14 November 2014 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <jon.hudson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA081ACD2F for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:13:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vkcaSsAvbo3N for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:13:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22f.google.com (mail-pd0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 171D61ACD17 for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:13:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id w10so2322312pde.6 for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:13:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=NhBpxriWnEgDqoZ/6NR7Bt2pq5N0JuoL2CzIlRIFqAk=; b=YmnkGfqyqDKOCfSjWTrM+Y8OsNLvYipk7tW7PqL1v5LOjGMXjclho6pWJKqTSWe50i 6MgT5cr/rLbe/Qtg8L2u+BFzhv2H0nbwwahoa3tWT3nSSO0DHs39qYhIEjz6ZBUaJ6c6 u+hWXzLLXUorN+xvGsPB+WqOHca7zFWyYgOch9hj8olCKJ7Ts48LfhvjMGwrd3j7bIRh ekzksY3RrVoVdg53gIpnfpLYlYTGnTjBTB6wIMbaYnfujBt55CXpJ6V49WVxjGnas5zc TwfNQlM/KWGU8GapWYyaHC5wfiYwj0MVne4TJyypnnB7hDem98LuezVa+o5hXwe0n1oy ga/g==
X-Received: by 10.66.237.145 with SMTP id vc17mr12972707pac.34.1415999615220; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:13:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.9.92] ([64.129.13.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id k4sm148603pbq.74.2014.11.14.13.13.34 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:13:34 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Jon Hudson <jon.hudson@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B411)
In-Reply-To: <20141114210358.GJ3008@mx1.yitter.info>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 11:13:33 -1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7D8BE6C9-0022-4361-951A-187C466FC105@gmail.com>
References: <CB79E3A1-A560-41A3-90CF-E1302AC6997E@bangj.com> <F4CB1B4F-5681-47B8-B522-2C1CFE8989F6@gmail.com> <F96AFD65-DE2A-4A5A-B058-D0B96D96260F@puck.nether.net> <546658E3.2040500@rrbone.net> <1EBC33C7-E093-4166-AA06-95B030AC99C7@cisco.com> <8DE7E39C-5D9E-4D08-BD91-2188D23A0E8D@gmail.com> <20141114210358.GJ3008@mx1.yitter.info>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/91attendees/oGjtsWDAEg9jTIOD4rHjem8zXSA
Cc: "91attendees@ietf.org" <91attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives
X-BeenThere: 91attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 91 attendees that have opted in on this list." <91attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/91attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:91attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 21:13:39 -0000

Clarification below....

> On Nov 14, 2014, at 11:03 AM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:00:14AM -1000, Jon Hudson wrote:
>> 
>> Would just be nice if those of us with "corporate sponsors" could help those who are "free agents"
> 
> I don't know about your corporate sponsor, but mine is not ok with me
> choosing to pay a higher price if I can get a lower one.

In my mind the individual would cover the difference. I would not expense that.

> 
> It might be possible to set up a fund for donations to such
> participants, however.  (No, I am not volunteering.)  Corporations
> could then donate to that fund.
> 
> A
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 91attendees mailing list
> 91attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email