IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives

Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org> Fri, 14 November 2014 22:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rpelletier@isoc.org>
X-Original-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5068D1ACD6A for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:38:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NKtEnIZ_xPgA for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:38:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0642.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::642]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF2851ACD7F for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:38:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-b7de.meeting.ietf.org (31.133.183.222) by BY2PR06MB234.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.47.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.16.15; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 22:37:52 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Ray Pelletier <rpelletier@isoc.org>
In-Reply-To: <636AF99A-177F-49AD-A94B-298D4DBA932A@netapp.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 12:37:36 -1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <8068D41C-AE84-4071-BC99-0EE889098630@isoc.org>
References: <CB79E3A1-A560-41A3-90CF-E1302AC6997E@bangj.com> <F4CB1B4F-5681-47B8-B522-2C1CFE8989F6@gmail.com> <F96AFD65-DE2A-4A5A-B058-D0B96D96260F@puck.nether.net> <546658E3.2040500@rrbone.net> <1EBC33C7-E093-4166-AA06-95B030AC99C7@cisco.com> <8DE7E39C-5D9E-4D08-BD91-2188D23A0E8D@gmail.com> <20141114210358.GJ3008@mx1.yitter.info> <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B27B7BD@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com> <636AF99A-177F-49AD-A94B-298D4DBA932A@netapp.com>
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Originating-IP: [31.133.183.222]
X-ClientProxiedBy: DBXPR04CA0040.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.141.8.168) To BY2PR06MB234.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.242.47.20)
X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR06MB234;
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:;
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR06MB234;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 03950F25EC
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(51704005)(24454002)(51914003)(189002)(377454003)(377424004)(199003)(50986999)(92726001)(31966008)(102836001)(4396001)(86362001)(93916002)(87286001)(50466002)(36756003)(110136001)(21056001)(46102003)(93886004)(92566001)(104166001)(89996001)(50226001)(122386002)(101416001)(23746002)(107046002)(40100003)(77156002)(62966003)(77096003)(42186005)(106356001)(105586002)(95666004)(83716003)(20776003)(64706001)(76176999)(87976001)(33656002)(57306001)(66066001)(82746002)(120916001)(15975445006)(88136002)(47776003)(19580405001)(19580395003)(99396003)(97736003)(7099021)(104396001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR06MB234; H:dhcp-b7de.meeting.ietf.org; FPR:; MLV:ovrnspm; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR06MB234;
X-OriginatorOrg: isoc.org
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/91attendees/kY0zzHAnNM2eufuV21-wQiT0xL8
Cc: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>, "91attendees@ietf.org" <91attendees@ietf.org>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
Subject: Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives
X-BeenThere: 91attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 91 attendees that have opted in on this list." <91attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/91attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:91attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 22:38:23 -0000

On Nov 14, 2014, at 11:21 AM, Eggert, Lars <lars@netapp.com> wrote:

> On 2014-11-14, at 11:06, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
>> The route for donations already exist through becoming an ISOC sponsor.
>> https://www.internetsociety.org/form/donation
> 
> Do you know if it is possible to indicate that a donation to ISOC should fully benefit the IETF? As compared to ending up in their overall budget?

Thanks for the leading question!

We are working on such a mechanism as part of a longterm IETF sustainability initiative,
which is in its infancy stages.  Keep the good thoughts though.

There will be more info, but it’s premature now.  

Ray

> 
> Lars
> _______________________________________________
> 91attendees mailing list
> 91attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email