IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Fri, 14 November 2014 04:57 UTC

Return-Path: <iljitsch@muada.com>
X-Original-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45861A1A7A for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:57:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wy5j8pXYnXn7 for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:57:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (sequoia.muada.com [IPv6:2001:1af8:3100:a006:1::]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDD341A6F03 for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:57:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wired-v6.meeting.ietf.org (wired-v6.meeting.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:100c:e33a:5ba9:eeab] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id sAE4uqrb005147 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 14 Nov 2014 05:56:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <3305B86C-1752-4D30-9A0D-70EFD23506E6@muada.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:56:51 -1000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1286918D-58E1-420A-94CE-62B3F9D3287A@muada.com>
References: <CB79E3A1-A560-41A3-90CF-E1302AC6997E@bangj.com> <3305B86C-1752-4D30-9A0D-70EFD23506E6@muada.com>
To: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/91attendees/cXW8EVmDmCOkqNQ8BGdPk87Usn8
Cc: "<91attendees@ietf.org>" <91attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives
X-BeenThere: 91attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 91 attendees that have opted in on this list." <91attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/91attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:91attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 04:57:10 -0000

On 13 Nov 2014, at 18:47, Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> wrote:

> However, in addition to what Bob said, consider the total costs rather than just the registration fee. The extra $10 a day fee increase would easily be offset by cheaper hotel and food options than what's available in Waikiki.

Oh, and I meant to include:

Don't underestimate the value of having everyone in the same room at the same time for beverages and snacks. If everyone needs to run out to buy their own this will use up time that can't be used for impromptu discussions.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email