[91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Fri, 14 November 2014 04:00 UTC

Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2A11A00DB for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:00:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.861
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.861 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QThaGhbab5Iv for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:00:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (amt0.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DACFD1A00BD for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:00:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-a274.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-a274.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.162.116]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 362F81342 for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 22:57:35 -0500 (EST)
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CB79E3A1-A560-41A3-90CF-E1302AC6997E@bangj.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 18:00:06 -1000
To: "<91attendees@ietf.org>" <91attendees@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.0 \(1990.1\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1990.1)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/91attendees/K69FYyfEqPgrmrjYhBh5Iob42j0
Subject: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives
X-BeenThere: 91attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 91 attendees that have opted in on this list." <91attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/91attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:91attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 04:00:11 -0000

I know the organizers are trying to do the best they can and they have a lot of demands from us on them for features and great hotel venues but I just noticed the fee increase from $650 to $700 for the next IETF meeting.

This may not seem like much difference to most corporate attendees but it's already a burden for small companies and self employed.

There are some of us that would rather do with less services than pay more.

As far as I'm concerned, you can cut things down to the bare minimum. I can get my own snacks, drinks, breakfast. We can minimize the extra meeting rooms, etc.

I would rather have a greater diversity of companies, individuals, and students than price these people out of the event.

I'm not criticizing the current decisions but just suggesting a different path as an option.

Thanks,
Tom