Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives
Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com> Fri, 14 November 2014 22:17 UTC
Return-Path: <olejacobsen@me.com>
X-Original-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 543E41ACFA8 for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:17:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ovWdfqTikf2H for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:17:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from st11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com (st11p00mm-asmtpout003.mac.com [17.172.81.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 700D91ACF9F for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:17:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net (173-11-110-132-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.11.110.132]) by st11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.10(7.0.4.27.9) 64bit (built Jun 6 2014)) with ESMTPSA id <0NF100FHPV8GZG00@st11p00mm-asmtp003.mac.com> for 91attendees@ietf.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 22:17:11 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 14:17:05 -0800
From: Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
In-reply-to: <20141114210358.GJ3008@mx1.yitter.info>
Message-id: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1411141416220.20939@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net>
References: <CB79E3A1-A560-41A3-90CF-E1302AC6997E@bangj.com> <F4CB1B4F-5681-47B8-B522-2C1CFE8989F6@gmail.com> <F96AFD65-DE2A-4A5A-B058-D0B96D96260F@puck.nether.net> <546658E3.2040500@rrbone.net> <1EBC33C7-E093-4166-AA06-95B030AC99C7@cisco.com> <8DE7E39C-5D9E-4D08-BD91-2188D23A0E8D@gmail.com> <20141114210358.GJ3008@mx1.yitter.info>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.13.68,1.0.28,0.0.0000 definitions=2014-11-14_08:2014-11-14,2014-11-14,1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=4 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1408290000 definitions=main-1411140167
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/91attendees/O1CGfb234tLzzzxnOQBCmKT4Lss
Cc: 91attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives
X-BeenThere: 91attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 91 attendees that have opted in on this list." <91attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/91attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:91attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 22:17:15 -0000
T-shirts, I'm telling you! Price them at $50 and get a bunch of idiots like me to work the project :-) Ole J. Jacobsen Editor and Publisher The Internet Protocol Journal Office: +1 415-550-9433 Cell: +1 415-370-4628 UK Cell: +44 7805 977889 docomo: (090) 3337-9311 Web: protocoljournal.org E-mail: olejacobsen@me.com E-mail: ole@protocoljournal.org Skype: organdemo
- [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Tom Pusateri
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Jon Hudson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Toerless Eckert
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Bob Hinden
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Daniel Jewell
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Tom Pusateri
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Livingood, Jason
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Ray Pelletier
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Jared Mauch
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Michael Richardson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Michael Richardson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Dominik Bay
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Jon Hudson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Jon Hudson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Eggert, Lars
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives ietf
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Toerless Eckert (eckert)
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Voyer, Daniel (520309)
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Ray Pelletier
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Livingood, Jason
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Alan Whinery
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Ray Pelletier
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives David Conrad
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Alan Whinery