Re: [93attendees] Network experiment during the meeting

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Tue, 14 July 2015 23:14 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE721B2F6D for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:14:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UgBDU4r2Me7L for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B6341B2F4E for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:14:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1ZF9PS-0003RY-60; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:14:46 +0000
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:14:43 -0700
Message-ID: <m2fv4qjpr0.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Joseph Lorenzo Hall <joe@cdt.org>
In-Reply-To: <CABtrr-UzcxOLtu831s5+hxSYN3i-G9iG=0PfEi3xHCjiksy4Xg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <55A41BEB.3090102@hs-augsburg.de> <cd99761b951e4dba89903d99d249ff22@hioexcmbx07-prd.hq.netapp.com> <55A54CA4.1080404@sunet.se> <CABtrr-UzcxOLtu831s5+hxSYN3i-G9iG=0PfEi3xHCjiksy4Xg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/xU-LAYowWKmpFD0ELkEpv4lS4AI>
Cc: attendees <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] Network experiment during the meeting
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:14:49 -0000

> hash MAC addresses with a salt/key that is securely destroyed
> immediately afterwards

how yucchhy.  use a one way hmac, which will preserve uniqueness (for
correnation) but provide reasonable hashing

randy