Re: [apps-discuss] Updating the status of SPF

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 11 August 2011 16:32 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF94121F8876 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.624
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.624 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2sIHwfueuyjV for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F42321F8839 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:32:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-239.cisco.com (unknown [64.101.72.239]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 730F841477; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:34:45 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4E440434.7070905@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:32:52 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
References: <20110809225415.89118.qmail@joyce.lan> <4E42BE19.9090609@tana.it> <CAC4RtVBr2D+7UkFMyaL6inwvA0cPOg-Td39xSfLoG5wtVVyGFA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVBr2D+7UkFMyaL6inwvA0cPOg-Td39xSfLoG5wtVVyGFA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2
OpenPGP: url=https://stpeter.im/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Updating the status of SPF
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:32:28 -0000

<hat type='AD'/>

On 8/11/11 10:09 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:
> OK... so unless my co-chairs or the ADs object, I'm happy with letting
> initial charter discussion happen here.  Who will post a draft charter
> proposal, and when?  Once things get started and a reasonable charter
> looks like it's coming together, y'all can ask the ADs for a mailing
> list to take the discussion further, and to get into the details.
> 
> Note that I suggest you NOT use the existing spf-discuss list, to keep
> the IETF work on an IETF mailing list.  People from spf-discuss that
> are interested in working on the IETF documentation should be
> encouraged to come to the IETF lists for that.
> 
> If you do decide to start the charter discussion here, please keep it
> to charter stuff, and save details for an SPF mailing list when it's
> created.

Barry, that all seems reasonable to me.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/