Re: [apps-discuss] Updating the status of SPF

["J.D. Falk" <[e-mail]>]

On Aug 11, 2011, at 12:38 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:

> That means that what you want to say is that the working group is, at
> this charter stage, documenting the *existing*, widely implemented
> protocol, which has sufficiently broad, interoperable deployment to be
> on Standards Track.  Say that there are suggestions for changes that
> are not part of the current widespread implementation, some of which
> are not backward compatible, and that *all* these changes (whether
> backward compatible or not) could be in scope for a future recharter
> or new working group, but are not in scope here.

+1

Otherwise, this WG will be little more than a big drawn-out argument.

--
J.D. Falk
the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions