IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Updating the status of SPF

Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com> Thu, 11 August 2011 17:40 UTC

Return-Path: <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DA55E8013 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.024
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.024 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l6nxyQKzaQiD for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gw0-f44.google.com (mail-gw0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C732A5E8011 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20so1738883gwb.31 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=7p0r+Ss/gvq1H1XIhey1T9V9zIZcgEZskRxV68rI11w=; b=bvrecV/TEQgujyuhlsFaKPArUct2BZJCiarmJxAXYUiu8BrFxlOttJX+mMy6FDIBu3 tJHs0mPT7CZhmOg83aW0jbvRbvvRGQXxVMiqc7RdGmJUN/vb3LpVO4SqbAuVUfn7gQot HqyeFPDAXxNvN9hlMywavtNdSmwPFkA5fCoA0=
Received: by 10.142.196.17 with SMTP id t17mr2199489wff.276.1313084459059; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.143.157.2 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 10:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4E4405F3.90101@dcrocker.net>
References: <4E4112B4.7000905@tana.it> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF642@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <201108092337.39408.scott@kitterman.com> <4E4405F3.90101@dcrocker.net>
From: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 19:40:39 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHhFybp2OW1N23Bv4qakXcwPzpcgzXRmQCF1Keay53+TW=c4VA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Updating the status of SPF
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 17:40:25 -0000

On 11 August 2011 18:40, Dave CROCKER wrote:

> What are the criteria you are using to determine what should be changed?

As far as the errata are concerned, that was a process in the OpenSPF.org
community reviewed on the mailing list (IIRC it was an "other IETF list"
before 2008-08) and in the SPF Council.  All results were published on
<URL:http://www.openspf.org/RFC_4408/Errata>, submitted to the RFC editor,
and reviewed by the IESG in 2010-07, who recommended to tackle this in a
new RFC:  <http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=4408&eid=994>.

-Frank

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email