IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Updating the status of SPF

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 11 August 2011 16:39 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEAA21F8C74 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:39:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.498, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4IEHf1BKEpN5 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B1921F8C52 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.156] (adsl-68-122-69-114.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.122.69.114]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p7BGeJ3b018458 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:40:24 -0700
Message-ID: <4E4405F3.90101@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:40:19 -0700
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Scott Kitterman <scott@kitterman.com>
References: <AcxV+CxT9WxP2wTLTNWpQ3LXOor+nw==> <4E4112B4.7000905@tana.it> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF642@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <201108092337.39408.scott@kitterman.com>
In-Reply-To: <201108092337.39408.scott@kitterman.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Thu, 11 Aug 2011 09:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Updating the status of SPF
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 16:39:51 -0000

On 8/9/2011 8:37 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I've already started locally looking at what changes need to be made in RFC
> and updating the draft.  There are a few errata, but I doubt there is a lot to
> do.


Scott,

What are the criteria you are using to determine what should be changed?  What 
is the basis for using those criteria?  For example, what is the likelihood that 
others in the community will agree with your choices?

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status