IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-discuss] Updating the status of SPF

"J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org> Tue, 09 August 2011 00:39 UTC

Return-Path: <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED8621F8B6F for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 17:39:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id onvyzeRAl2S4 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 17:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ocelope.disgruntled.net (ocelope.disgruntled.net [97.107.131.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1A821F8B67 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 17:39:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.11.32] (c-76-126-154-212.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.126.154.212]) (authenticated bits=0) by ocelope.disgruntled.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id p790e2LR017938 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 17:40:04 -0700
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.6.0 ocelope.disgruntled.net p790e2LR017938
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cybernothing.org; s=fudge; t=1312850405; bh=y9H6zlKapjUpVXaChMv6tnLCiSM8xp6vZW56kgE82 cU=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=SY6S1fM4CGma m0h6RM0zS9uss/l9OE9bnGz/54lKeZGt75hODuZagg4a7tWUkR5XdtAA86XhZCA0Uq4 CJAq3wlGH0PUnU+nGpXtCeAMnxohBzdzip924TRNgy6bDj2VRs6M2ezYTW56KXwonL5 EUlt2p9HlyERXkOjXB1FYJlBc=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk-lists@cybernothing.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVCncUmdM+g8c+tTBGMnXHtL5+5hGwNF7+n14sDbBst8WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 17:40:02 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <CDCE0E05-EF47-4E8F-B772-8038C4B9B975@cybernothing.org>
References: <AcxV+CxT9WxP2wTLTNWpQ3LXOor+nw==> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F13512DF606@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com> <CAC4RtVCncUmdM+g8c+tTBGMnXHtL5+5hGwNF7+n14sDbBst8WQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "apps-discuss@ietf.org Discuss" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Updating the status of SPF
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:39:39 -0000

On Aug 8, 2011, at 1:02 PM, Barry Leiba wrote:

> I believe this absolutely needs its own WG, and the proponents should
> work on a draft charter.  The charter should be clear that it's aiming
> to move SPF to Standards Track, that it is specifically NOT addressing
> Sender-ID, and that any merging of Sender-ID into SPF is out of scope.
> The charter should have explanatory text about the experiment having
> been done, the results being clear, and deployment being widespread.
> The WG wants, it should say, to document the experimental results and
> shift SPF onto Standards Track.

+1, particularly regarding documenting the results.

--
J.D. Falk
the leading purveyor of industry counter-rhetoric solutions

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email