IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applications Area Review Team

John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com> Tue, 22 March 2011 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <klensin@jck.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3452C28C0D6 for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.632
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.632 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IzNoDrHZkNLA for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673833A6864 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:46:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Q23oh-0001Po-IC; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:48:19 -0400
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:48:18 -0400
From: John C Klensin <klensin@jck.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
Message-ID: <5B7D1FDCE1F3352D668006CC@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <4D88C0D5.1030606@isode.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20110318165117.0d43e6e0@elandnews.com> <4D861898.2040101@isode.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110320113434.0c1626b8@elandnews.com> <7AE95D9A5FCB3646106E712E@[192.168.1.128]> <6.2.5.6.2.20110321111536.0ce71198@elandnews.com> <5AF51E51-0E2C-4E48-AA81-AAC78CDAFDF3@standardstrack.com> <4D88C0D5.1030606@isode.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Cc: apps-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applications Area Review Team
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:46:49 -0000

--On Tuesday, March 22, 2011 15:31 +0000 Alexey Melnikov
<alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:

>...
> Do we really need to decide on a specific term length?
> I would rather the Team Lead resign when she/he feels burnt
> out, or Apps ADs ask the person to step down.

+1.  I think it is perfectly reasonable for prior team leads to
say to an incoming one "you may notice signs of burnout in a
year or two; if you do, quit before they get severe".   But
let's not spend energy making, and then trying to enforce/
interpret, specific rules.

   john

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email