Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applications Area Review Team

[SM <[e-mail]>]

Hi Claudio,
At 11:53 19-03-2011, Claudio Allocchio wrote:
>Please change the implicit ACK with an explicit ACK, and 24 hours is 
>really only for very urgent requests (IESG queue) and should be used 
>only a very short urgent reviews. 2 *working* days is much more 
>likely to accomodate all.

As you have all argued against the impilcit ACK, let's go an explicit 
ACK of two days.  I suggest that you let me get away with not 
specifying "working" as I would then have to keep track of national 
holidays around the world. :-)

I reserve the right to ask for you to be dropped off the team if I do 
not receive an explicit ACK for three assignments over a period of 
six months. :-)

>well, the above does not cover all possible compbinations, and 
>"structuring" too much requires a full list of combinations. Or... 
>the above are just "examples" of short summaries.

The above are just "examples".

>and Yes... IETF style application of the guidelines ("rough common 
>sense") works better than literals. :-)

In the IETF, common sense is subjective. :-)

Best regards,
-sm