Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applications Area Review Team

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 22 March 2011 19:57 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D425228C166 for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.343
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.343 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.244, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XE5JX0Xu24fI for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D748F3A6842 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.4] (adsl-67-127-56-68.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.127.56.68]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2MJwZer031653 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:58:40 -0700
Message-ID: <4D88FF69.10006@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:58:33 -0700
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20110318165117.0d43e6e0@elandnews.com> <4D861898.2040101@isode.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110320113434.0c1626b8@elandnews.com> <7AE95D9A5FCB3646106E712E@[192.168.1.128]> <6.2.5.6.2.20110321111536.0ce71198@elandnews.com> <5AF51E51-0E2C-4E48-AA81-AAC78CDAFDF3@standardstrack.com> <4D88C0D5.1030606@isode.com> <6266.1300808696.317839@puncture> <6.2.5.6.2.20110322110356.0d72fc08@elandnews.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20110322110356.0d72fc08@elandnews.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: apps-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applications Area Review Team
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:57:11 -0000

> I'll answer the question before it gets asked; I don't feel burnt out yet. I may
> be the last person to see the signs. If anyone ever notices that, please do tell
> me. I don't have any issue with Pete. There couldn't be a better time to open
> this discussion as there aren't any elements that might cause a fuss.


And as long as we are dotting the i's and crossing the t's of delicacy and to o 
make sure there is no confusion from my side:  None of this is about you or your 
performance.  It's a design discussion purely.

As much as you all know that I hate to offer criticisms, I'm sure that were you 
doing something onerous I, or some other apps wallflower, would overcome our 
hesitance to comment on it.

If anything, as I implied in my previous note, you've distorted the discussion 
by having done such a /good/ job.  Makes it more difficult to juggle the 
possibility of the alternative...

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net