Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applications Area Review Team

+1,000

On Mar 20, 2011, at 6:09 PM, John C Klensin wrote:

> 
> 
> --On Sunday, March 20, 2011 13:08 -0700 SM
> <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:
> 
>> One suggested change that has not be discussed is the Team
>> Lead.  The Team Lead should have a good relationship with the
>> Apps Area ADs as he or she works under their direction.
>> Keeping a Team Lead for too long does not ensure continuity.
>> I would like the team to discuss with the Apps Area ADs when
>> they meet in person about:
>> 
>>  (i)   Should the Team Lead be selected for a year only
>> 
>>  (ii)  Should the Team Lead have IESG experience to provide
>> better guidance to reviewers
> 
> One comment on that question: one of the things the IETF does
> much less well than it should is to arrange things that
> familiarize new people with how the system works and generally
> to do leadership development.  While one might gain something in
> efficiency by having a team lead who was a former AD, it would
> be _far_ better, IMO, to use the position as an opportunity for
> increased understanding of the community, actors, and dynamics
> (as I am sure it has been for you).   As long as things are
> fairly open, there will always be present and ex-ADs ready to
> step in and provide that sort of guidance, perhaps even when the
> team lead doesn't want it :-).  But let's not throw away the
> opportunity to read more people in on the system in order to
> gain small marginal efficiencies by reusing the same folks over
> and over again.
> 
>    john
> 
> _______________________________________________
> apps-review mailing list
> apps-review@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review

Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applications Area Review Team

Attachment: smime.p7s