IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applications Area Review Team

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Sun, 20 March 2011 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2209D28C0D8 for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.589
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.589 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w4U-kv1B0rry for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B6728C0CF for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:13:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.13] (adsl-67-127-56-68.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.127.56.68]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2KFExst018790 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:15:04 -0700
Message-ID: <4D8619EF.9030407@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:14:55 -0700
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20110318165117.0d43e6e0@elandnews.com> <4D84D06B.2070600@dcrocker.net> <4D861764.9040208@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D861764.9040208@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, dcrocker@bbiw.net, apps-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applications Area Review Team
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 15:13:34 -0000

On 3/20/2011 8:04 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> I think this is a good format and it is quite similar to what GenArt and SecDir
> teams are using.


I hadn't thought about commonality across the IETF, but now that you've 
mentioned it, I suggest we try to get a single template defined for the entire 
IETF -- as long as it remains advisory rather than compulsory.  Reviewers need 
to be able to make the actual decisions, but it helps to present a community 
preference.

Unless someone can come up with a compelling reason for having differences, I 
think a common template would make style and expectations more consistent.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email