Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applications Area Review Team

SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Tue, 22 March 2011 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C298128C179 for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:00:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.574
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id itYz-Or4KgTX for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:00:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.elandsys.com (mail.elandsys.com [208.69.177.125]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228EC28C1ED for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:00:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([41.136.238.255]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.elandsys.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2MJ1PxZ023475; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:01:31 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1300820493; bh=DiivkcCXEaLVAW4UY5dk3gMBxGw=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=jTKoG+JKIc32bgqkLWnBLppZE53fcVVu/VjeSkB2cULoLKqE4xfVbc4NiE3ArWbn5 +6sa9djR5PBEd/k5S+usRp4YxY60QneAoyY0VG2iacvtvIyPMRWTY2XPFnCPme14RV 6J2KZb3Z98H/BUM5K8KT3d2X33gNKH2nSuEGcRB4=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20110322110356.0d72fc08@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:01:03 -0700
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
From: SM <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
In-Reply-To: <6266.1300808696.317839@puncture>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20110318165117.0d43e6e0@elandnews.com> <4D861898.2040101@isode.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110320113434.0c1626b8@elandnews.com> <7AE95D9A5FCB3646106E712E@[192.168.1.128]> <6.2.5.6.2.20110321111536.0ce71198@elandnews.com> <5AF51E51-0E2C-4E48-AA81-AAC78CDAFDF3@standardstrack.com> <4D88C0D5.1030606@isode.com> <6266.1300808696.317839@puncture>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: apps-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applications Area Review Team
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:00:19 -0000

Hi Dave,
At 08:44 22-03-2011, Dave Cridland wrote:
>A term gives the option to step down - or be asked to step down -
>with much less fuss.

I avoided the word "term" as I view the selection as informal.  The 
conversation might go like this:

AD: Would you like to be team lead?  Your predecessors did the work 
for period X.

Candidate: What's the pay like?

AD: Twice as much what we pay the reviewers.

Candidate: Where do I sign up?

I'll answer the question before it gets asked; I don't feel burnt out 
yet.  I may be the last person to see the signs.  If anyone ever 
notices that, please do tell me.  I don't have any issue with 
Pete.  There couldn't be a better time to open this discussion as 
there aren't any elements that might cause a fuss.

Best regards,
-sm