Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applications Area Review Team

[SM <[e-mail]>]

Hi Dave,
At 12:58 22-03-2011, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>And as long as we are dotting the i's and crossing the t's of 
>delicacy and to o make sure there is no confusion from my 
>side:  None of this is about you or your performance.  It's a design 
>discussion purely.

I am reading it as a design discussion.

>If anything, as I implied in my previous note, you've distorted the 
>discussion by having done such a /good/ job.  Makes it more 
>difficult to juggle the possibility of the alternative...

Thanks.  I'll highlight a previous comment you made "Waiting for 
someone to burn out is not a great management policy".  If everything 
is working well, is it is worth the effort to have this discussion 
and consider the alternative?  I believe it is a good time to do so 
as we can then have this light-weight discussion.

Best regards,
-sm