IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews

ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) Sun, 20 March 2011 10:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA9A3A69E8 for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 03:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oNvT-U79wUCU for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 03:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nougat.ucs.ed.ac.uk (nougat.ucs.ed.ac.uk [129.215.13.205]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BFA53A6A45 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 03:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nutty.inf.ed.ac.uk (nutty.inf.ed.ac.uk [129.215.33.33]) by nougat.ucs.ed.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p2KACTHq009558; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 10:12:33 GMT
Received: from calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk (calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk [129.215.24.15]) by nutty.inf.ed.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2KACTxx022429; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 10:12:29 GMT
Received: from calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p2KACTe8009434; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 10:12:29 GMT
Received: (from ht@localhost) by calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id p2KACSmP009430; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 10:12:28 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning: calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk: ht set sender to ht@inf.ed.ac.uk using -f
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20110318165117.0d43e6e0@elandnews.com> <4D850453.1090509@qualcomm.com> <4D853F38.4080203@dcrocker.net>
From: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 10:12:24 +0000
In-Reply-To: <4D853F38.4080203@dcrocker.net> (Dave CROCKER's message of "Sat, 19 Mar 2011 16:41:44 -0700")
Message-ID: <f5b8vwanlrr.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) XEmacs/21.4.21 (linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Edinburgh-Scanned: at nougat.ucs.ed.ac.uk with MIMEDefang 2.60, Sophie, Sophos Anti-Virus, Clam AntiVirus
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.60 on 129.215.13.205
Cc: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>, apps-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 10:11:22 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

SM writes:

> 1. Is this the sort of thing you think you all would be willing to do?

Yes.

> 2. How often would you be willing to do it? For example, is it
> reasonable to ask people to look at one document per week for this
> kind of quick review?

No -- 1 per month maybe, and not, of course, when a 'real' review is
also underway.

Dave CROCKER writes:

> The "quick" will help avoid doing the detailed part of the review, but
> I find the difficult part of a review to be formulating coherent,
> summary assessments.

Exactly: "I'm sorry this is so long, I didn't have time to make it shorter"

ht
- -- 
       Henry S. Thompson, School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh
      10 Crichton Street, Edinburgh EH8 9AB, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
                Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                       URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail from me _always_ has a .sig like this -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFNhdMMkjnJixAXWBoRAjtUAJ9/EFaOA3ymn8dGai3hVMSs/9nhBgCdFAoL
afMFdC0AseFj+2wjctKrw5Y=
=ij22
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email