Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews (Was: Suggested changes for Applications Area Review Team)
Claudio Allocchio <Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it> Sat, 19 March 2011 23:23 UTC
Return-Path: <Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it>
X-Original-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA7E3A6A62 for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 16:23:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.022
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.022 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.578, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I1vgZ+sYbNJO for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 16:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cyrus.dir.garr.it (cyrus.dir.garr.it [IPv6:2001:760:0:158::29]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771603A6A41 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Mar 2011 16:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mac-allocchio3.garrtest.units.it (mac-allocchio3.garrtest.units.it [140.105.201.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by cyrus.dir.garr.it (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2JNOj9f042356 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:24:46 +0100 (CET)
X-DomainKeys: Sendmail DomainKeys Filter v1.0.2 cyrus.dir.garr.it p2JNOj9f042356
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=garr.it; c=simple; q=dns; b=sXzCdL9tbGObZaJr+lm6bpySs6nssixv4+cX78P2zo33a7Zu4UaX0/u6XmocUkdZN lljDuxHtUrffjPLgE8DyIYy6v3MG1H3BkA66K9wo8C6ZFDRe8ZFBE9tRlS6toar+wn0 X+zXzYE3dMGt9Wn0XbsTTRmqWoOi8a7QF/rLL/A=
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:24:44 +0100
From: Claudio Allocchio <Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it>
X-X-Sender: claudio@mac-allocchio3.garrtest.units.it
To: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D850453.1090509@qualcomm.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.02.1103200018430.1148@mac-allocchio3.garrtest.units.it>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20110318165117.0d43e6e0@elandnews.com> <4D850453.1090509@qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: apps-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews (Was: Suggested changes for Applications Area Review Team)
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2011 23:23:28 -0000
> 1. Is this the sort of thing you think you all would be willing to do? yes. As early to start watching a proposal, the easier it is also to discuss about it, avoind the "but the WG already extensively discussed this and agreed, why you now want to change it?" - it just happened in my last review for example. > 2. How often would you be willing to do it? For example, is it reasonable to > ask people to look at one document per week for this kind of quick review? one per week (per each individual) is really a lot, expecially if it comes from non-apps areas. You need some time to focus what the specification purpouse is, ... and often the "hey but this is going to have consequences here!" does not come after a first reading, but after "some meditation in the shower", when the how water runs out :-) The idea is a good one, but I'd say 1 doc per month is defintly more likely to be fulfiled. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Claudio Allocchio G A R R Claudio.Allocchio@garr.it Senior Technical Officer tel: +39 040 3758523 Italian Academic and G=Claudio; S=Allocchio; fax: +39 040 3758565 Research Network P=garr; A=garr; C=it; PGP Key: http://www.cert.garr.it/PGP/keys.php3#ca
- [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applications … SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Martin J. Dürst
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Kurt Zeilenga
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… John C Klensin
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Claudio Allocchio
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews (Was: Suggest… Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews (Was: Sug… Ted Hardie
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews (Was: Sug… Claudio Allocchio
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews (Was: Sug… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews Henry S. Thompson
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews (Was: Sug… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews Pete Resnick
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… John C Klensin
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Eric Burger
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews (Was: Sug… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Eric Burger
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… John C Klensin
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave Cridland
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave CROCKER
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… John C Klensin
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… SM
- Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applicati… Dave CROCKER