IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews

Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com> Sun, 20 March 2011 15:09 UTC

Return-Path: <presnick@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18B228C0D8 for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.595
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52IOwe1IcNvi for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365FC28C0CF for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:09:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=presnick@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1300633880; x=1332169880; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:x-originating-ip; z=Message-ID:=20<4D861916.30504@qualcomm.com>|Date:=20Sun, =2020=20Mar=202011=2010:11:18=20-0500|From:=20Pete=20Resn ick=20<presnick@qualcomm.com>|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0 =20(Macintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B =20en-US=3B=20rv:1.9.1.9)=20Gecko/20100630=20Eudora/3.0.4 |MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20<apps-review@ietf.org> |Subject:=20Re:=20[apps-review]=20Early=20Cursory=20Revie ws|References:=20<6.2.5.6.2.20110318165117.0d43e6e0@eland news.com>=09<4D850453.1090509@qualcomm.com>=20<4D853F38.4 080203@dcrocker.net>=20<f5b8vwanlrr.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.a c.uk>|In-Reply-To:=20<f5b8vwanlrr.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac. uk>|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3D"ISO-8859-1 "=3B=20format=3Dflowed|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit |X-Originating-IP:=20[172.30.48.1]; bh=AVCnX3snDDm4QtQw/G/myKCtNe5cTEOGcW7Kaz37ZTI=; b=PIzcpn6OP0Un0a9iG1eslxHNGd0Vy1Ie9AjQoOrGXyzvHGwQEGSNTj9g wYjn8TM30s3zU4L3unDyrU4rikPOvJmbvfkak6QFd0lX9WwhnpzzDDtwL alXe+JXzbs+jjZXjEFt1elEy0zV1/F646harB2U59mfKSyWAg1S7PCEVN 0=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6290"; a="81030112"
Received: from ironmsg04-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.18]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 20 Mar 2011 08:11:20 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,214,1299484800"; d="scan'208";a="37270391"
Received: from nasanexhc04.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.17]) by Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 20 Mar 2011 08:11:19 -0700
Received: from Macintosh-4.local (172.30.48.1) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (172.30.48.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:11:19 -0700
Message-ID: <4D861916.30504@qualcomm.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 10:11:18 -0500
From: Pete Resnick <presnick@qualcomm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100630 Eudora/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: apps-review@ietf.org
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20110318165117.0d43e6e0@elandnews.com> <4D850453.1090509@qualcomm.com> <4D853F38.4080203@dcrocker.net> <f5b8vwanlrr.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <f5b8vwanlrr.fsf@calexico.inf.ed.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [172.30.48.1]
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Early Cursory Reviews
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 15:09:49 -0000

Many people wrote:
>> 2. How often would you be willing to do it? For example, is it  reasonable to ask people to look at one document per week for this  kind of quick review?
>>      
> No -- 1 per month

It's pretty funny that everyone (including Alexey when I first brought 
the idea to him) said exactly the same thing. Followup question:

Even if you were assigned one per month, what would be the amount of 
time you would want from "pickup out of the queue" until "completion of 
review"? What I worry about is the same thing SM is trying to address 
with the initial proposed changes: I don't want to wait for a month to 
find out that someone is *not* going to be able to complete a review and 
then we have to restart the month timer in the queue, especially for 
what I'm hoping is an early cursory review. Is one week enough time to 
complete a review of this sort, even if you are only asked to do one per 
month?

pr

-- 
Pete Resnick<http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/>
Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email