IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applications Area Review Team

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Tue, 22 March 2011 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-review@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF8428C127 for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.562
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1+Gg9dmrpPSH for <apps-review@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from peirce.dave.cridland.net (peirce.dave.cridland.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:882:2e0:81ff:fe29:d16a]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668A228C0D6 for <apps-review@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 08:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (peirce.dave.cridland.net [127.0.0.1]) by peirce.dave.cridland.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CC3116808D; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:45:01 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at peirce.dave.cridland.net
Received: from peirce.dave.cridland.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (peirce.dave.cridland.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2KU1jCAyVN98; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:44:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from puncture (puncture.dave.cridland.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:882:221:85ff:fe3f:1696]) by peirce.dave.cridland.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5131A1168067; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:44:56 +0000 (GMT)
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20110318165117.0d43e6e0@elandnews.com> <4D861898.2040101@isode.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20110320113434.0c1626b8@elandnews.com> <7AE95D9A5FCB3646106E712E@[192.168.1.128]> <6.2.5.6.2.20110321111536.0ce71198@elandnews.com> <5AF51E51-0E2C-4E48-AA81-AAC78CDAFDF3@standardstrack.com> <4D88C0D5.1030606@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D88C0D5.1030606@isode.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <6266.1300808696.317839@puncture>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:44:56 +0000
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Apps Area Review List <apps-review@ietf.org>, Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; delsp="yes"; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [apps-review] Suggested changes for Applications Area Review Team
X-BeenThere: apps-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Apps Area Review List <apps-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-review>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-review>, <mailto:apps-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 15:43:42 -0000

On Tue Mar 22 15:31:33 2011, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Do we really need to decide on a specific term length?
> I would rather the Team Lead resign when she/he feels burnt out, or  
> Apps ADs ask the person to step down.

A term gives the option to step down - or be asked to step down -  
with much less fuss.

I don't think there's a requirement to mandate a maximum, either - if  
someone's happy to continue for another term and the AD is willing to  
let them, then that's fine.

Dave.
-- 
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave@cridland.net - xmpp:dwd@dave.cridland.net
  - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
  - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email