IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] "psd=" tag early assignment

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 07 July 2022 20:33 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACEB2C13C528 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 13:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.856
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.856 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=bAVcR7ac; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=TUD9WLDS
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g99UKYjx0B5t for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 13:33:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF116C15A756 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 13:33:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 66365 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2022 20:33:00 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=1033b.62c742fc.k2207; bh=C5rsun1qVtxsidkMVoYPMr+3sNHPJdi4uirrwM7Iu68=; b=bAVcR7acwdLGxgMR2J2dZMaEVHlsjOUU/k0L9YttXchP1QngJHsNnzOfVbp+tzQTR4KFpsAh9erZLNwsKZqsdl20RV+HK/JHMgGJ7PxE4iEy/xvVZ3mPH5ra24kURR2oh8ay1GFMdvIkC1l4Cf9CloqOEJVZ9qvLCC8bBaeJoNbb9Kb7V6CqOtRhIibubX+OratE74dirUo5DFKuficFIdOT70K3erxpfdolmCenP8otS7U7bbzsvL3QSRdM71i5wrDMIlVfsMlDNDDh5L6VB17fuLEJJxSYZ2hu8IeulnyMTqs08NmFr2ggxwD/HI/M5/czn46j4+V3UsPaDbzIBg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:cleverness; s=1033b.62c742fc.k2207; bh=C5rsun1qVtxsidkMVoYPMr+3sNHPJdi4uirrwM7Iu68=; b=TUD9WLDSwK8gMC9/kxNkWq9emjApDvZfiMY55nE8kl+o0ZpCSvDh83d8uErltDBO1MbO+90VHg7Qrr+AMJ3Z/ygudMupgtxBKgmdaj/xLa9gyD5OzJ1SmulHrjXQEAbCwkRuZ1LZjufdTMQfLvX2SC+IiYu9XSL3UDGZKbt8B4JRcNJ7i+/6QFd7hqwMDCQDjwup9+CKA2sVmsiIj3DhUvTkUjK2MxTetlbqikNZnmM9dmWEjNtNogtWSfkkGLgadM25e+VprlgsZBtJJhxROMqfTkBrQ22STx1ENwDjiWUq/ZlUUfRGUw6pYD4drWd78mcU96AAflo8KnDBKIpt5A==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 07 Jul 2022 20:33:00 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0602A45178AF; Thu, 7 Jul 2022 16:32:56 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 16:32:56 -0400
Message-Id: <20220707203257.0602A45178AF@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
Cc: vesely@tana.it
In-Reply-To: <b87b71c5-c4bc-b963-06eb-dd94cca1340d@tana.it>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Cleverness: minimal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/9t7SP5jPlbhTLtb_LQoOkKUEigI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] "psd=" tag early assignment
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2022 20:33:07 -0000

It appears that Alessandro Vesely  <vesely@tana.it> said:
>Anyway, we need an appendix with an example of private (or should we 
>call them secondary?) registry, to illustrate both the algorithm and 
>the setting of psd='s.

Please, no.

The description of the tree walk should be clear enough. Stacked PSDs
are an 0.001% corner case and a long discussion of them will just
confuse the 99.999% of domains unaffected by them.

If this infinitesimal nit is really the only thing we have left to
argue about, we must be done and we should ship it.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email