IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] "psd=" tag early assignment

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Fri, 08 July 2022 11:01 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC3CC14F73B for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 04:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.003
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.003 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.876, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=tana.it header.b=ENAm9X0/; dkim=pass (1152-bit key) header.d=tana.it header.b=BS3+S2eQ
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uvQNj1KYKw0f for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 04:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (wmail.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12F86C14F726 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 04:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=epsilon; t=1657278060; bh=GMZzmh90thb2wuI0zOVMf+Z4xBjqOp5sipQJyXP+Zgs=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=ENAm9X0/lZAVZSqRX7cZXgJ/bi3Bcxz0Lqnq9jpzsPDf5vNxSG1qOjZWWQnVoF+8m l8rfxR8T1KvI0rIwVoNAQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tana.it; s=delta; t=1657278060; bh=GMZzmh90thb2wuI0zOVMf+Z4xBjqOp5sipQJyXP+Zgs=; h=Date:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=BS3+S2eQHnI+qyNG8gfqlWqMdprbprAPz/HxA2L3aklvQ+dVrjNndJGAMSL3wQsRP tAJjHjo08iSJwgIzXMoTk6l4/2uS5Fd1SijjHeMsiuEv2lGIoig6zyJQclok3l9U1g TypAWvM+vSS9f7404oFZGo4PJ+kbrDVR1ifVeQDbAKF/W41NkSr3dTNNf0xwz
Author: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Received: from [192.168.1.108] (host-82-56-132-47.retail.telecomitalia.it [82.56.132.47]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 uXDGrn@SYT0/k, TLS: TLS1.3, 128bits, ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) by wmail.tana.it with ESMTPSA id 00000000005DC03D.0000000062C80E6C.00001512; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 13:00:59 +0200
Message-ID: <4dd4e7a3-2d7f-ec63-17cc-72c9a7b642ce@tana.it>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2022 13:00:59 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1
Content-Language: en-US
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, dmarc@ietf.org
References: <20220707203257.0602A45178AF@ary.qy>
Authentication-Results: tana.it; auth=pass (details omitted)
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <20220707203257.0602A45178AF@ary.qy>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/bMCKqiEsIABI_8hLLlPaWv8d7Cs>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] "psd=" tag early assignment
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2022 11:01:16 -0000

On Thu 07/Jul/2022 22:32:56 +0200 John Levine wrote:
> 
> The description of the tree walk should be clear enough.


Yeah, /should/!  The very fact that you yourself changed your mind 
about how it works, without going into the hassle of explaining your 
reasoning, proves that a more extensive walk though can assist 
developers in writing code that they can understand.


Best
Ale
--

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email