IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] what to document about the tree walk

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Fri, 15 July 2022 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8010C13C50F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 12:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=7SBEULzz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=ZIKTxjo8
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6nogRnnnwYkq for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 12:28:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08E90C13C50C for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 12:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2E31F80272; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 15:28:10 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1657913290; h=date : from : to : subject : in-reply-to : references : message-id : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=/LjvuHFWQih7iqFVsJS8C64b3qPEIARCYtpljMrgr1U=; b=7SBEULzz1NTNlWB1Rfo4hMKc7bDuQF/TnbzqK4PlDaECt6k3XguZ6lphPIAs2qtUKxPjS eNrh5wUkGVncTqcBw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1657913290; h=date : from : to : subject : in-reply-to : references : message-id : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=/LjvuHFWQih7iqFVsJS8C64b3qPEIARCYtpljMrgr1U=; b=ZIKTxjo8E8sMswnD2duLubSvhIJhH3oA3dcQ12aaB2whihZVkrIqnvEK3GkoMABx2KBtF Ec7rALU6iKOZo8BjKVmyOQt0Y1sJtKU2HJQpYMoTrhqcf1vezDcZgT2gyniPYmhh4XQSEfh m8k28mLyadTW1Owh3ofHFGuI/2VxlUmuDtoExshHD2cmqK34A6oyFy+C7bnBDebOJcj0/bt wuwCHbD7QI2x+17k4Dt3lhXh4hvFGPurucbb9XWTH0gmGkKTGPn2uVQeBmsL0Ktrd8hsVTB Da4lH51MXsKxFRMLnsEsDT+4GXiQ+PLviFiZ9+0D40q74hl8edvTa2HIrsLg==
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [107.72.96.117]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E449F801F0; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 15:28:10 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 19:28:09 +0000
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <28c80b51-b11a-b1e7-76f3-a006b5e6078e@iecc.com>
References: <20220710010547.DB3B04532F40@ary.qy> <c4a7fd03-eae8-497f-3133-73523a9c1ca2@tana.it> <5197ba5f-9de4-d838-1579-eae67683e2d4@taugh.com> <650cadee-db8f-a54a-4d14-082c2d0bed02@tana.it> <0f3a343b-e7ea-7509-ceab-e5670aac8616@taugh.com> <CAH48ZfxHgxZwu3zLh99pc1JS4s==9bxU-0nS78O=7UAnZ=DtUQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHej_8nkpGo30b9-ZkRc_wokymJ2ry_hsMgzaB2m4EH-WWG_zw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH48ZfzoVocPRKeVTqf6AE6Z48AWKFObm7X5oDa1ic1sQ5V1zg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZFO_KK3+RUdzMLyjW0uOnzi4mXcVww1Mqx8tmhe-x2hA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH48ZfwTaf75HiJS2_VJKez8s3FqMh-K_6eD2eqaJatXWwcKww@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbxoijfdfxpS5-LRPifxg+4e_ndBGQhne5s5of0zxBbMQ@mail.gmail.com> <D3807517-98C3-4F20-A594-F3109BCB831A@kitterman.com> <f5e3f92b-f95e-a3a5-c74d-bd0957bec61a@tana.it> <4293C636-9656-4122-80D6-5E2DE4D790B4@kitterman.com> <CAL0qLwZN8VfB2SLTindAO4P0_h47wphh2OZy8p8U3xM7-ZNGWA@mail.gmail.com> <66093339-4dae-4479-39e2-283ce7f8f21f@tana.it> <28c80b51-b11a-b1e7-76f3-a006b5e6078e@iecc.com>
Message-ID: <D572951E-FBE6-46E6-8176-81AB8E3C27D7@kitterman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/i7oWOGhquRsxBUy8RYUcgUi06wM>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] what to document about the tree walk
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 19:28:24 -0000


On July 15, 2022 6:26:39 PM UTC, "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 15 Jul 2022, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> +1 from me too.  Note, though, that the (current) DNS is accidentally correct most of the time, as far as our Tree Walk is concerned.
>
>No, it's not an accident.  We designed the tree walk based on our knowledge of the way people publish DMARC records.

+1.  I was going to write something along these lines, but John got to it first.  PSL is the accidentally correct approach.  The DMARCbis design is aligned to how DMARC works.

Scott K

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email