IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] what to document about the tree walk

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Fri, 15 July 2022 18:26 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64D0C14F741 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LFclj38RxAkS for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:26:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 376AEC14F72D for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 11:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 68079 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2022 18:26:41 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=109ed.62d1b161.k2207; bh=EywlHiwbcrKAZH5nK22SBKlolSawlzARrsm6HG6H61Q=; b=Eb1nEMKzKYzsmSnuPnp0Sr6b3jrP2YoIJNJIlUCusdI6BDdmiUoz1h4Z7cXdL2ZYBYTWQL2zxvbJfniTuSFL6marLd8WN/75uBHal7xDJpduQwZOCwugIb4LCFc7DDWEAPrpdeMG7P7hJ2efL7Yd0VJxc4i/e3/hyLa0pRRPTSYIjQWE8C4YJWjKtI5WC7dNl+72SiulaZLYyyNIYXh4arsgeGbNBaz/PZ6kis0q7sJs4fD3Ed2k8MNV/Q/tVMBxUi1/hEZkdVUEiMxOZq+KJsKJsm67470hqA6bkpQBLzsS6UHI1XoZ5QShxouBoWZdLWHdaeyYg74HjOyGcG2tYw==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 15 Jul 2022 18:26:41 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id F141F45E02E7; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 14:26:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424B345E02C9; Fri, 15 Jul 2022 14:26:39 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 14:26:39 -0400
Message-ID: <28c80b51-b11a-b1e7-76f3-a006b5e6078e@iecc.com>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, dmarc@ietf.org
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.qy
In-Reply-To: <66093339-4dae-4479-39e2-283ce7f8f21f@tana.it>
References: <20220710010547.DB3B04532F40@ary.qy> <84DDA91C-26E2-4803-8C6C-0369ED67298F@kitterman.com> <c4a7fd03-eae8-497f-3133-73523a9c1ca2@tana.it> <5197ba5f-9de4-d838-1579-eae67683e2d4@taugh.com> <650cadee-db8f-a54a-4d14-082c2d0bed02@tana.it> <0f3a343b-e7ea-7509-ceab-e5670aac8616@taugh.com> <CAH48ZfxHgxZwu3zLh99pc1JS4s==9bxU-0nS78O=7UAnZ=DtUQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHej_8nkpGo30b9-ZkRc_wokymJ2ry_hsMgzaB2m4EH-WWG_zw@mail.gmail.com> <CAH48ZfzoVocPRKeVTqf6AE6Z48AWKFObm7X5oDa1ic1sQ5V1zg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZFO_KK3+RUdzMLyjW0uOnzi4mXcVww1Mqx8tmhe-x2hA@mail.gmail.com> <CAH48ZfwTaf75HiJS2_VJKez8s3FqMh-K_6eD2eqaJatXWwcKww@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbxoijfdfxpS5-LRPifxg+4e_ndBGQhne5s5of0zxBbMQ@mail.gmail.com> <D3807517-98C3-4F20-A594-F3109BCB831A@kitterman.com> <f5e3f92b-f95e-a3a5-c74d-bd0957bec61a@tana.it> <4293C636-9656-4122-80D6-5E2DE4D790B4@kitterman.com> <CAL0qLwZN8VfB2SLTindAO4P0_h47wphh2OZy8p8U3xM7-ZNGWA@mail.gmail.com> <66093339-4dae-4479-39e2-283ce7f8f21f@tana.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/GnbKRJN_bTp7Q7XLmrzVDlj1-tE>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] what to document about the tree walk
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2022 18:26:49 -0000

On Fri, 15 Jul 2022, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> +1 from me too.  Note, though, that the (current) DNS is accidentally correct 
> most of the time, as far as our Tree Walk is concerned.

No, it's not an accident.  We designed the tree walk based on our 
knowledge of the way people publish DMARC records.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email