IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] "psd=" tag early assignment

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Fri, 08 July 2022 16:55 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBD7C157B5D for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 09:55:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0L8DBRrQaNMs for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 09:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x232.google.com (mail-lj1-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::232]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF31AC14CF18 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2022 09:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x232.google.com with SMTP id 19so5736984ljz.4 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 09:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7MqyH5yF6HYJbJYFVvl/bqwWqgeyszVFRXqPlvJY29w=; b=nwMpeCsTtyV879x5DlNBg5sNH25VdN2T6y4ocRqQHqEUlUgO07jvfFsCYRqDKG4E9k K3iQeqAeOOEKDKRf//frlaoVmNIAzOG/8N02iSbR+VdeuuvRFMgIVv/DqP5K21vyl9FP mvh4OZZmPzwopxQSQYUTGqrm3cAVLpqErU0s4Y0VjvwknF4zHpss2prVhuizA8AI0r33 j2cSiq+MFcoWTArzHSc67bqHAgmHqETcbDfZIZXIlh4JSMZ8Cl5+u1tye9eUDlWLYBpo x63NGQ/SnZK9eKtNKHIVB7JLlEoKaKaxR6bEAue6nWuZU/sVE07qkra8WBQJLxjfurpy Gtkg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7MqyH5yF6HYJbJYFVvl/bqwWqgeyszVFRXqPlvJY29w=; b=Ym5zw3fv1k3iM8aVUEMUIXBtqitZbBO5VxM6MobjJ53+B1Zkt7O5RcS2WtjmutWLbF F8y+48siWaKUrY4A0w1udhuXhVtCYYKH/XN094aoxIcw/fgKo0wA4D7dRyIv6Rqr6f7m GiqGb0uXP/IibFsQB1GQoIUwduNybZIT4WrVsVrvkY641yktbJAYQ3QnMUe1EynUSWCU +A569sbBdVu+27f0Xy0fJMOwv5O6DHDE+ZACFdPluzNklflZrvtr8Xy/EBWkkkc/+dTZ /VonCScGLvIltSCFnZREqXuJWZRvH3WX3IYL01r78lb+uDiKhGDZY1tFYnkPjd7WZX/1 znuw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/kYdEl4j9VvTFsv74nO5D+P9bk6um1QvGh8LwujUTlXVj5VAEt PQHvPMAthxdfv/vY6n/kRnyi2xWeLLnhIjeX9FY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tksaINEq7LbULOGzctIHq78efPhajb3D36K8/cSFcSFOO00ypH2A9le90avscgdQh4+SZomOEyBDZCQHFbyl0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:1549:b0:25b:d2dc:2e8f with SMTP id y9-20020a05651c154900b0025bd2dc2e8fmr2429813ljp.334.1657299309130; Fri, 08 Jul 2022 09:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <b87b71c5-c4bc-b963-06eb-dd94cca1340d@tana.it> <20220707203257.0602A45178AF@ary.qy> <CAH48Zfwvbkeq8CzXeb959Ehv-Gc9KxBc-Q5Op25oU1GGNF=NQg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH48Zfwvbkeq8CzXeb959Ehv-Gc9KxBc-Q5Op25oU1GGNF=NQg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2022 09:54:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwYNVZSBYnBWx7ASHGO00_FrUB1NW=vrNHji+K3F0NrOPw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Douglas Foster <dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009b776a05e34e10c5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/n04fdtA1Cybc-huaKV4HRQVAjoc>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] "psd=" tag early assignment
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2022 16:55:12 -0000

Speaking only as a participant:

On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 4:47 PM Douglas Foster <
dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com> wrote:

> So John has confirmed that it is his intent to hide any information about
> private registries, because the private registries create complexity for
> his algorithm which he does not wish exposed.
>

I submit that equating "this is not worth explaining as it's a corner case"
to "we should hide this detail because I don't want anyone to know about
it" is logically absurd as well as baldly antagonistic.

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email