IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dmarc-ietf] "psd=" tag early assignment

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sun, 26 June 2022 16:06 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3A3C15AAE2 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 09:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.41
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.41 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pIjUs66sSErL for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 09:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-f41.google.com (mail-ed1-f41.google.com [209.85.208.41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B3F9C14CF1A for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 09:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-f41.google.com with SMTP id e40so9932346eda.2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 09:05:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=u+rdm9+1lYCmys3KPlH3rTitCHi6qLYf18dFYx4ZiIU=; b=EXS4wO7fnuf5UThPvKgb7CetxQ2/EgbpV3t3rdk48yKN6bPZdj5FcbgWyXsikT8DYR MW65UE98fsk7nJYn24qJbi1TL92TQmMN1AIXPFxaXjMSA1/XZFM04GrjlujOdyfqtn0m u1P9catV4Z+YWQpqa2PId/Gdnbtr3afMqOHscJEpgGJD/ofg1sFa/Q6rd0o2/v+hocT6 qrayyITEt0/2aMVw9041v1GMr/TGhvVnyEk5wf/QVu7Cq06qCWfbo2NM5515+bR0i0v9 jiEi2iq1ooPIVSOeMON3vzeNqL6B8F/Za6WjIY711Xl6/4oAee36B0D/Vz4/CbVmNosc PV+Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora+RSBcp+hgV6tMu0KdB8HW4yyFYmD5Y2dd/8hRVNIxx2wqA5bZE b1vN1XS8Nkq4KREDXTuyFvQJlKjydJWv/cWHA2edjVQB
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1sbwc0RljLC+lknxcEApAf+M/lRj5Bq+KgL4MfNrf75ziUXdIZ1vs/4C6FV7DoHFSwd2P/oJZh+ES6DggkHMeg=
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:cb83:0:b0:435:9170:8e3b with SMTP id r3-20020aa7cb83000000b0043591708e3bmr12015394edt.144.1656259556675; Sun, 26 Jun 2022 09:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2106279.dWI8RDzgUi@zini-1880>
In-Reply-To: <2106279.dWI8RDzgUi@zini-1880>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 12:05:44 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJLFY6s6+4xFs9iu-YSbrihnThgDEkb1+g2NUAt-QS_mTw@mail.gmail.com>
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/IOv9OVO5UnKLqEOKSv-cz0ZjNbk>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] "psd=" tag early assignment
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2022 16:06:03 -0000

As we've discussed on this mailing list, there is some evangelizing to
be done regarding the domains that should add psd=y to their DMARC
records.  We should have the tag added to the relevant IANA registry
before we embark on that, and the current dmarcbis draft is ready for
supporting that registration.

The registry policy is Specification Required; Scott Kitterman is the
designated expert for the
registry and is prepared to approve the registration if the working
group is ready to do it.  Todd, as draft editor, could make the formal
registration request to IANA.

So: Is the working group ready to register the psd= tag, based on the
description in the -10 version of the dmarcbis draft?  The relevant
documentation includes the description in Section 4.8 and the formal
definition in Section 5.3.

Please comment in this thread about whether you agree with making the
registration now, or whether you do not agree and why.

Barry, as chair

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email