IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] what to document about the tree walk

John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 12 July 2022 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993D2C14F74F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 08:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=bftg5/Zs; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=mKUF29/U
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CuRGP8jbe-qC for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 08:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7685BC14F74C for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 08:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 50740 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2022 15:12:42 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=c630.62cd8f6a.k2207; bh=Q28T46r/wbuvinwqa9blNw7KA2R87EHe/O4sUL/cGKw=; b=bftg5/ZsUKmIzhCLK3WZ7LCnQBRQjp5VsM1xVnu+R6sHtK2Zs6nOePKzlF6FvrZCdXE8skoWhWoKAed5WXgi1+eEunXE5UAIZypX2XCU+7cfQh6MaOxxqMueSMUFvQoZwWkwq7Zv3tw8wwTbDVgqJNwgpL2IdNf/scg23M9msl4zgYxQB4oumpKPhYRQAaVZVoRSRkhUZpvfXzdn4BJXGn51OUO8+I80anBsgwigP7WWRFyDxuGBmk4Hp4xJaL8WcthoOrPSfEjrUtM7WtdLFMBdH0OMFtXJ6Skfb7NtUp37/3kS4Mv8h09j29BJrJPw8I+fsJjPDMqSD0y0q0lHUQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type; s=c630.62cd8f6a.k2207; bh=Q28T46r/wbuvinwqa9blNw7KA2R87EHe/O4sUL/cGKw=; b=mKUF29/UcHhhZMwZh+5/GoYtPMP+gYwvD63TBL2j7yjBCjAZ6GHunf8uixs68TbxTzw9LjgXj9L8kLEWekOH4QI7MtTtj1Yav+o7YncbjzcTA0I9RA6zAB5WZZlcB4vdacd1jw7k8Ur1rNF59tCmeIREUOpGNp7GnumRh8nVOITGsIcK/tFdAvy+Jw26MeKhS+1W6YO5a3LPF4x+z77ml7gX5p6fP3Uy7VOlTmlKncbPmrW9/RgaAm/xFsY0rqcc2yMVNTU1xlXT08JjSnxjt51rPQ78jFQXNkajIZFc2AgxdwwMLJC9uDs6QHg5RjISDidpaZFBHTaHQiDcWoH4Gg==
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.3 ECDHE-RSA AES-256-GCM AEAD) via TCP6; 12 Jul 2022 15:12:41 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3C32D45873A4; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:12:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ary.qy (Postfix) with ESMTP id B188F4587386; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:12:40 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 11:12:40 -0400
Message-ID: <0f3a343b-e7ea-7509-ceab-e5670aac8616@taugh.com>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>, dmarc@ietf.org
X-X-Sender: johnl@ary.qy
In-Reply-To: <650cadee-db8f-a54a-4d14-082c2d0bed02@tana.it>
References: <20220710010547.DB3B04532F40@ary.qy> <d8716435-8a52-dac4-ede2-6c27fced7f0f@tana.it> <84DDA91C-26E2-4803-8C6C-0369ED67298F@kitterman.com> <c4a7fd03-eae8-497f-3133-73523a9c1ca2@tana.it> <5197ba5f-9de4-d838-1579-eae67683e2d4@taugh.com> <650cadee-db8f-a54a-4d14-082c2d0bed02@tana.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/fylIUJxcltioUInbZTEW_PuvxXk>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] what to document about the tree walk
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:12:50 -0000

> A.6 seems to be dealing with a different subject.  I can still sketch some 
> text to be added there, though.  I attach the diff.

I realize this is getting repetitive but:

-- PSDs are very, very rare, and users will generally never see them
-- long discussions of PSDs will just confuse people
-- I don't even think these examples get the tree walk right.

Hence, this change is not an improvement.  I don't plan to argue further 
unless we see more support for this very bad idea.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email