Re: [dmarc-ietf] what to document about the tree walk

Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com> Wed, 13 July 2022 02:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sklist@kitterman.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7ABC157B56 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 19:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=kitterman.com header.b=KAxDKTyb; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kitterman.com header.b=kw8RvdQl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UthQdAcYWNXI for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 19:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [IPv6:2604:a00:6:1039:225:90ff:feaa:b169]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 312BFC14F73B for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 19:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from interserver.kitterman.com (interserver.kitterman.com [64.20.48.66]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADC77F802DC; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 22:12:12 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903e; t=1657678332; h=date : from : to : subject : in-reply-to : references : message-id : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=zWlZPDWAC74oMvhCrHM1px/LB2QPBXS7YQnyB083S1s=; b=KAxDKTyb7Zso5NpMP17Y0LZF6KEgwQY1Kd1z/XALtiwTRasLlTv+KWi5QRwTztyy7Tak1 uYId7/B3kBWDWsLCg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kitterman.com; i=@kitterman.com; q=dns/txt; s=201903r; t=1657678332; h=date : from : to : subject : in-reply-to : references : message-id : mime-version : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : from; bh=zWlZPDWAC74oMvhCrHM1px/LB2QPBXS7YQnyB083S1s=; b=kw8RvdQliDjU/faJdW0lnL7EUoQ1e3PgsZcI7Xw/DPw2KqtICAa05Glc7JTv6DVx92DEY 4WrsDifMjOiuhNpdTOkI1NUnY1332NMrf0nA59CEE03wZHgXoIH3bItFPQDDhgxiGOiN9Nh n3pap6xNY++sAPT8riBYt2Rr2woZn3JcbB7ZxvgMe+eeS8/doMWQTE26W+GgGOamLbDPajo yD81rkQ6Iy8X63AmO209u4xUGAB4i+tVq7HpbJuAhUXcs8sp7HBb2REaXveBUOg3SOsj/Du toLAroM09+u/+XVge047jbkGILYrkPvGMGITMk7BuYDiarL9vX80PSBYRk7Q==
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [12.217.64.83]) by interserver.kitterman.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F529F801F0; Tue, 12 Jul 2022 22:12:12 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 02:12:09 +0000
From: Scott Kitterman <sklist@kitterman.com>
To: dmarc@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20220713020545.7FFC345927B0@ary.qy>
References: <20220713020545.7FFC345927B0@ary.qy>
Message-ID: <2836AB69-CFE2-4065-A600-A86434110F92@kitterman.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/UIlmddY8Niyff284mjFoYbDk2Zk>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] what to document about the tree walk
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 02:12:24 -0000


On July 13, 2022 2:05:45 AM UTC, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>It appears that Todd Herr  <todd.herr@valimail.com> said:
>>On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 1:30 PM Douglas Foster <
>>dougfoster.emailstandards@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> What problem does this tree walk solve?  Can anyone explain how this tree
>>> walk improves on RFC7489 evaluation results?
>>>
>>>
>>RFC 7489 acknowledged that its methods for discovering the organizational
>>domain had shortcomings. ...
>
>While I agree with everything you said, I really hope we can avoid
>wasting time relitigating decisions we've already made.

Yes.  Please!

Scott K