IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] "psd=" tag early assignment

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 27 June 2022 13:27 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5AEAC14F73A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 06:27:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.406
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.406 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N4gj6OnLBOPd for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 06:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-f44.google.com (mail-ed1-f44.google.com [209.85.208.44]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 324D1C14F738 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 06:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-f44.google.com with SMTP id z7so12982323edm.13 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 06:27:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LDZV3ppIPncJtGyXj0G31367dvJeggLoUjc/oWghFIc=; b=Oo8T0wlgafs+FlBLd3o+0fQysnOwvSyFIhFrBCF+3vy8ySNFuvOZqZPztEDYI63Lq2 FyzVCDugdYEFXHTnikMG6Gsay1uI1xWSygRiu8Lcw4xPOzIPF644qj1NJ/F47wXDbC7s ailWkR4TJsVWdqZcuuUaAfdIOyoSBIguuV9SpuVGqc/9HSazfUNUiEUPOnJVraJslASR 11f4r2WiA10kyWm2zzw9utJola0Hm8CL6ourAkrlc8Eg1lGE3Tr22ucb57yD2rrQgWNE 7BWw/gxN/+oI27O+TuhEIjK1cZ9HuVIzycAODipcnfGnsBR3E92frPgD8y4cfqLHFXdp A3Mw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora9zcPNDTKhJCJ6FO1sBaz6rY+ZiNR0BYcyImJH70j1eRpGQR6pm GKeCkle8BF++2dRTlsGkshi8lDRZJ7VwAjR50r9Jywjh
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1udEcZug1jXGmP32lo6JHQyTPfP3PaPdwefsnxf4pRipNs4vV17T0+mHrVNwZrnz3Gn9YEp4+HnN4/TfTDX1Vs=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:4244:b0:437:726c:e1a with SMTP id g4-20020a056402424400b00437726c0e1amr14074194edb.107.1656336469534; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 06:27:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2106279.dWI8RDzgUi@zini-1880> <CALaySJLFY6s6+4xFs9iu-YSbrihnThgDEkb1+g2NUAt-QS_mTw@mail.gmail.com> <95b1d241-0e3c-edf3-4768-cf08b7d73283@tana.it>
In-Reply-To: <95b1d241-0e3c-edf3-4768-cf08b7d73283@tana.it>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 09:27:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJJcd1e+iT0CwbQ738fMaX2-UQ+q7NvduK4a7J+H5Q0dVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/usN9iRDCx1iADfIeH1oLqhRuI60>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] "psd=" tag early assignment
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:27:52 -0000

I have to say, as a participant, that I have more than a little
sympathy for this suggestion or some derivative of it.  Using "psd" as
the tag name is rooted in history that will be lost as we move away
from using a public suffix list.

Barry

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 6:20 AM Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> wrote:
>
> On Sun 26/Jun/2022 18:05:44 +0200 Barry Leiba wrote:
> >
> > Please comment in this thread about whether you agree with making the
> > registration now, or whether you do not agree and why.
>
>
> I'd like to make a last appeal to use more intuitive symbols to be used instead
> of the current ones:
>
> instead of | use      | to mean
> -----------+----------+-----------------------------------------------------
> psd=u      | role=sub | the default subdomain role (never needed)
> psd=n      | role=org | the org domain (only needed with non compliant PSDs)
> psd=y      | role=psd | a PSD (needed if PSD published DMARC record.)
>
>
> The reason to use cryptic symbols seems to be to discourage their usage, which
> I can hardly understand.  I'd be OK with the current symbols if the WG can
> explain somewhat better, possibly as part of the spec itself, the rationale of
> using counter-intuitive yes/ no/ undefined to express that three-valued value.
>
>
> Best
> Ale
> --
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> dmarc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email